• Print

Overall, there were about 380,000 separations for sub- and non-acute admitted patient care in 2010–11. These accounted for about 4.2% of separations and 15.6% of patient days in public and private hospitals. This care includes Rehabilitation, Palliative, Psychogeriatric, Geriatric evaluation and management and Maintenance care (Figures 46 and 47). Rehabilitation care was the most commonly provided sub- or non-acute care type.

Figure 46: Separations for sub- and non-acute care, public and private hospitals, 2010–11

This bar chart shows the separations (in thousands) for sub- and non-acute care by public and private hospitals in 2010–11. The care types are Geriatric evaluation and management; Psychogeriatric care; Maintenance care; Palliative care and Rehabilitation.  

Figure 47: Patient days for sub- and non-acute care, public and private hospitals, 2010–11

This bar chart shows the patient days (in thousands) for sub- and non-acute care by public and private hospitals in 2010–11. The care types are Geriatric evaluation and management; Psychogeriatric care; Maintenance care; Palliative care and Rehabilitation.  

The volume of these services increased over the period 2006–07 to 2010–11, particularly for Rehabilitation in private hospitals (20% per year) and Geriatric evaluation and management care in public hospitals (16% per year) (Figure 48).

Figure 48: Change in the number of separations for sub- and non-acute care, public and private hospitals, 2006–07 to 2010–11

This bar chart shows  the percentage change in the number of separations for sub- and non-acute care by public and private hospitals from 2006–07 to 2010–11. The care types are Geriatric evaluation and management; Psychogeriatric care; Maintenance care; Palliative care and Rehabilitation.  

Who used these services?

About 56% of sub- and non-acute separations were for females, and less than 30% of sub- and non-acute separations were for people aged under 65 (Figure 49).

Figure 49: Separations for sub- and non-acute care, by age-group and sex, all hospitals, 2010–11

This bar chart shows the separations for sub- and non-acute care by age-group and sex in 2010–11. The age group are between 0-4 and 85+ years old, the sex gender are males and females.  

Less than 1.0% of sub- and non-acute separations were for Indigenous Australians, compared with 3.8% of admitted patient separations overall.

Persons usually resident in Major cities had 19 separations per 1,000 population for sub- and non-acute care, compared with 16 per 1,000 nationwide.

Separation rates varied by socioeconomic status, from 12 per 1,000 population for those classified as being in the lowest SES group to 23 per 1,000 for those classified as being in the highest SES group.

How did people access these services?

Almost half of separations for sub- and non-acute care began as either transfers from another hospital or occurred within the same hospital when the patient’s type of care had changed (for example, from Acute care to Rehabilitation) (Figure 50). This contrasts with only 5% of separations overall that were transferred from another hospital or were a care type change.

Figure 50: Separations for non-acute care, by mode of access, all hospitals, 2010–11

This pie chart shows the separations for non-acute care by mode of access in 2010–11. The mode of access are Admitted patient transferred from another hospital (23%), Statistal admission: type change (23%) and Other types (54%).  

How urgent was the care?

Less than 4% of separations for sub- and non-acute care were reported as emergency admissions, compared with 27% of separations overall.

About 66% were reported as elective admissions and 30% were other planned care.

Why did people receive this care?

The most common principal diagnosis was for Care involving use of rehabilitation procedures (287,000 separations).

Looking at second diagnoses for separations involving Rehabilitation care, the most common were:

  • arthrosis of the knee (about 48,000 separations)
  • arthrosis of the hip (20,000 separations)
  • fracture of femur (hip fracture, 16,000 separations).

For Palliative care, 8 out of the 10 most common principal diagnoses were cancer-related.

What care did they receive?

Around 880,000 procedures or other interventions were reported for sub- and non-acute separations. About 83% of sub- and non-acute separations in public hospitals and 95% in private hospitals involved a procedure.

The most commonly reported procedures were allied health interventions, including:

  • physiotherapy (over 290,000 separations)
  • occupational therapy (164,000 separations)
  • social work (89,000 separations).

How long did they stay?

The average length of stay for sub- and non-acute separations was 5.2 days in private hospitals and 19.2 days in public hospitals.

  • For Rehabilitation care, the average length of stay was 4.8 days in private hospitals and 17.4 days in public hospitals.
  • Separations for Maintenance care had the longest average length of stay (32.2 days), followed by Geriatric evaluation and management (19.1 days) and Psychogeriatric care (18.7 days).

Who paid for the care?

In public hospitals, about 76% of sub- and non-acute separations were public patients, 15% were funded by private health insurance and 6% were funded by the Department of Veterans' Affairs.

In private hospitals, private health insurance funded about 79% of sub- and non-acute separations, and 12% were funded by the Department of Veterans' Affairs.

How was care completed?

Just over three-quarters of separations for sub- and non-acute care ended in discharge of the patient to their usual place of residence, compared with over 92% of all admitted patient separations.  

Over 6% of separations for sub- and non-acute care ended in discharge or transfer of the patient to another hospital or other health care accommodation.

A further 5% ended in discharge of the patient to a residential aged care service (that was not their usual place of residence), compared with about 1% overall.

  • For Rehabilitation care 90% of patients were discharged to their usual place of residence, compared with 29% of patients for Palliative care (Figures 51 and 52)
  • Over half (58%) of Palliative care separations ended in the death of the patient (Figure 52).

Figure 51: Separations for Rehabilitation care, by mode of separation, all hospitals, 2010–11

This pie chart shows the separations for Rehabilitation care by mode of separation in 2010–11. The mode of separation are based on Discharge or transfer to other health care (5%);  Discharge or transfer to residential aged care service (1%); Statistical discharge: type change (4%); Died (0%) and Other types (90%).  

Figure 52: Separations for Palliative care, by mode of separation, all hospitals, 2010–11

This pie chart shows the separations for Palliative care by mode of separation in 2010–11. The mode of separation are based on Discharge or transfer to other health care (7%);  Discharge or transfer to residential aged care service (3%); Statistical discharge: type change (3%); Died (58%) and Other types (29%).