AIHW Board AIHW senior staff Annual report Capability statement Collaboration AIHW corporate plan 2016–17 to 2019–20 Customer care charter FOI - freedom of information Indexed list of files Nous review Organisation chart Presentations Privacy of data Public Interest Disclosure Tenders
By category Ageing, disability & carers Families & children Hospitals Housing & homelessness Indigenous Australians Population groups Risk factors, diseases & death Services, workforce & spending
By subject Adoptions Aged care Ageing Alcohol & other drugs Arthritis & musculoskeletal conditions Asthma Australia's health Australia's welfare Burden of disease Cancer Cardiovascular disease Child health, development & wellbeing Child protection Children's services Chronic diseases
Chronic kidney disease Chronic respiratory conditions COPD Deaths Dementia Dental & oral health Diabetes Disability Expenditure Eye health Food & nutrition Health indicators Health performance Homelessness Hospitals Housing assistance Indigenous Australians Injury Life expectancy
Male health Mental health Mothers & babies Overweight & obesity Palliative care Population health Primary health care Prisoner health Risk factors Rural health Safety & quality of health care Veterans' health Workforce Youth health & wellbeing Youth justice
In other sections Data Publications Contact AIHW
Publications CatalogueOrdering publicationsForthcoming publications Online reports Subscribe to release notices
By subject Adoptions Aged care Ageing Alcohol & other drugs AIHW annual reports Arthritis & musculoskeletal conditions Asthma Australia's health Australia's welfare Burden of disease Cancer Cardiovascular disease Child health, development & wellbeing Child protection Children's services Chronic diseases Chronic kidney disease
Chronic respiratory conditions Corporate publications Data linkage Data standards Deaths Dental & oral health Diabetes Disability Expenditure Eye health Food & nutrition General practice Health indicators Health performance Homelessness Hospitals Housing assistance Indigenous Australians Indigenous housing
Injury Life expectancy Male health Mental health services Mothers & babies Overweight & obesity Palliative care Population health Primary health carePrisoner health Risk factors Rural health Safety & quality of health care Veterans' health Workforce Youth health & wellbeing Youth justice
In other sections Subjects Data Contact AIHW
About AIHW data METeOR—metadata online registry Data by subject AIHW data collections Customised data analysis request Data governance framework Data linking Data standards GovHack Privacy of data Accessing Australian Government health and welfare data
By subjectAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework Adoptions Aged care Alcohol and other drugs Alcohol data sources Body weight data sources Cancer Children's headline indicators (CHI) Child protection Data sources for monitoring health conditionsDeaths Diabetes Disability
Expenditure FHBH - Fixing houses for better health General Record of Incidence of Mortality (GRIM) books Height and weight data sources Hospitals Indigenous Australians International collaboration Maternity Information Matrix (MIM) Medical indemnity Mental health Mortality Over Regions and Time (MORT) books National Aged Care Data Clearinghouse
National core maternity indicators (NCMI) National framework for protecting Australia’s children (NFPAC) National indicator catalogue National Youth Information Framework (NYIF) Perinatal data Primary Health Network (PHN) Specialist Homelessness Services (SHS) Tobacco data sources Workforce
In other sections Subjects Publications Contact AIHW
AACR ACFADD AHSAC AIHW Board AIHW Ethics Committee AODTS NMDS WG CKDMAC CMAG CVDMAC HEAC
IGIHM JJ RIG MHISSC NAGATSIHID NCSIMG NDDWG NDIMG NHISSC NIAG NIRAPIMG NMDDNMDS
NMHPSC NOPSAD NPDDC NPHEP NPHIC PCDWG PDWG PHIDG PHIG REDWG Workforce committees
Education worksheets Infographics What's in the pipeline Subscribe to education notices Other educational links
Resources by subject All Latest Ageing Australia's health Australia's welfare Carers
Children & youth Disability Disease Drugs
Health Health prevention Indigenous Australians Injury
In other sections Subjects Data Publications Contact AIHW
Job vacancies How to apply for a position at the AIHW Conditions of employment Benefits of working for the AIHW Temporary employment register Occupational Training Program Contact the People Unit Graduates
AIHW Access magazine Media releases Subscribe to release notices Embargoed access to AIHW material Media contacts
You are here:
This page refers to the Performance and Accountability Framework, an intergovernmental document that assigned various reporting responsibilities to the former National Health Performance Authority. From 1 July 2016, activities related to reporting against the indicators contained in the Framework are the responsibility of the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
The Framework directly applies the RoGS framework definitions of equity, effectiveness and efficiency (and cost effectiveness) to measure performance as follows.
Equity indicators measure how well a service meets the requirements of particular groups in society with special needs. Indicators may reflect both equity of access, whereby all Australians are expected to have adequate access to services, and equity of outcome, whereby all Australians are expected to achieve similar outcomes arising from service use.
Effectiveness indicators measure how well the outputs of a service achieve the stated objectives of that service. The reporting framework groups effectiveness indicators according to characteristics that are considered important to the service. These characteristics include access, appropriateness and/or quality.
Associated with quality is safety. Having quality health services delivered safely is paramount as it ensures public trust and confidence in the health system, and will often be a key determinant of patient outcomes. A continuous improvement culture that drives high quality health services is the foundation of health service delivery.
The Framework addresses this domain by ensuring that safety and quality data are collected, analysed and fed back for improvement, as well as comparison and accountability purposes. In addition, the Framework includes a number of patient outcome and patient experience indicators, as a measure of the health system is the benefit it provides the community and individuals.
Efficiency indicators (the relationship of inputs to outputs) measure how efficiently the outputs of a service were achieved. Technical efficiency indicators measure how well services use their resources (inputs) to produce outputs. Government funding per unit of output delivered is a typical indicator of technical efficiency. Allocative efficiency considers the use of resources across different care/treatment domains and strategic options, including in hospitals and primary care settings. Whilst indicators of allocative efficiency are not currently well developed in health care, they will be a focus for future development.
The Framework addresses the efficiency domain through the inclusion of efficiency and financial performance indicators as well as recognising that, over time, the indicator set for LHNs and Medicare Locals should be progressively revised by the Authority and Health Ministers to measure the integration and coordination of services through the development of indicators common to both an individual LHN and its relevant Medicare Local(s).
Cost-effectiveness indicators (the relationship of inputs to outcomes) measure how efficiently the outcomes of a service were achieved. Although no cost-effectiveness indicators are currently reported, a theoretical example would be government funding per life (or ‘quality adjusted life year’) saved through breast cancer screening.
Whilst a general framework can be applied across a spectrum of activity in the system, the different elements being reported on (in this case LHNs, public and private hospitals and Medicare Locals) will have differing levels of control over factors which may impact upon the performance being measured. Therefore the indicators chosen for performance accountability purposes recognise an appropriate degree of control so as to make them meaningful for this purpose.
As Medicare Locals evolve over time, they will be given greater responsibility and be able to exert greater influence on how services are delivered in the local area. To reflect this, performance reporting on Medicare Locals will initially focus on the input and process part of the service process chain in terms of how they are run, and how well they map out the availability and distribution of primary care services in their area. However, over time, as Medicare Locals receive funding to coordinate and plan services in the community, the output part of the service process will become the focus of performance reporting.
Initially, the performance of Medicare Locals will be measured through the efficiency domain in terms of how they manage the setting up of their structures and processes. The equity and effectiveness domains will start to be measured and related back to performance once Medicare Locals begin to coordinate and plan services.
Section 6.3 lists the initial indicators proposed for Medicare Locals and their communities noting that for the above reasons they will become more refined over time once Medicare Locals become more established in their communities. The indicators are mapped diagrammatically back to the performance domains—equity, effectiveness and efficiency, but there is a clear distinction between what the Medicare Local is being assessed against and the performance of its community (which currently cannot be attributed to the Medicare Local). As such, population health outcomes for the area for which the Medicare Local is responsible will initially be measured for context setting and planning purposes, rather than for accountability.
Performance reporting for LHNs and hospitals using the RoGS framework is more straightforward given there is already an established framework, and there is broad endorsement and acceptance of it and its indicators. Section 6.2 lists the initial indicators proposed for LHNs and hospitals under the Framework and maps them diagrammatically back to the performance domains – equity, effectiveness and efficiency, which thus allow for a systematic assessment of the performance of hospital care.