• Print

released: 21 Jul 2009 author: Australian Centre for Asthma Monitoring

This report is the result of a systematic review undertaken by the Australian Centre for Asthma Monitoring (ACAM) to refine and simplify asthma monitoring in Australia. A Delphi survey and correlation analysis were used to review the currently recommended list of 24 national asthma indicators in order to identify a smaller set of core indicators, which provide the most important and relevant information and which are more effective at signalling change for future asthma monitoring activities.

ISSN 1448-7594; ISBN 978 1 74024 938 6; Cat. no. ACM 15; 42pp.; INTERNET ONLY

Summary

This report forms part of a review undertaken by ACAM to refine and simplify Australia's national asthma data monitoring system.

Why refine the list of asthma indicators?

Currently 24 indicators are recommended for monitoring asthma at a population level to guide policy relating to the prevention and management of asthma in Australia. This is too many for an efficient monitoring program. The overall aim of this body of work was to define an efficient set of indicators for asthma that are useful for stakeholders, avoid redundancy and can be measured reliably and validly using population data.

Methods used to refine the list of asthma indicators

Two separate methods were employed to assess whether the number of asthma indicators recommended for monitoring could be reduced: a Delphi survey and an analysis of correlation among the indicators. A Delphi survey is an established qualitative research method used to systematically assimilate information from people with knowledge of the topic. We used a web-based Delphi survey, conducted over two rounds, to seek input from relevant asthma experts on the importance of each of the asthma indicators. We also asked them to rate each indicator in terms of its value in providing information to policy makers about the status of asthma in Australia. In the second round, panellists were sent their own previous responses, pooled results and anonymised comments of other participants. With this information they were asked to consider refining their answers. In conjunction with this process, correlation analyses were conducted to investigate whether there was any potential redundancy among the indicators.

Refined list of core asthma indicators

In conjunction with the correlation analysis, the Delphi survey has helped to obtain consensus about the most important asthma indicators for monitoring asthma at a national level. These indicators are:

  1. prevalence of current asthma
  2. deaths (all ages)
  3. deaths (5 to 34 years)
  4. hospitalisations
  5. asthma control
  6. general practice encounters
  7. asthma action plans
  8. quality of life
  9. preventer use
  10. costs of asthma.

This core set of indicators should be used to gain population-based information on asthma in Australia. However, this list does not preclude the use of other indicators where they are relevant to a specific purpose.

Recommended citation

Australian Centre for Asthma Monitoring 2009. Refining national asthma indicators: Delphi survey and correlation analysis. Asthma. Cat. no. ACM 15. Canberra: AIHW. Viewed 12 June 2013 <http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442468267>.