ICF Australian User Guide V1.0


 Contents 

5.    Activities and Participation: application in Australia

5.8    Advice to users - and how to contribute to national development by recording use in a 'test template'


This section has focused on Activities and Participation, both in terms of the life domains listed in the ICF, and the measures relating to them.

On the A-P list and the possibility of delineating Activities and Participation on domains according to WHO's option (a) it is suggested that agreement on splitting the domains may not generally be possible. One Australian application now developed (see Section 10.1) illustrates the benefits of using the flexibility offered by the classification with the new combined list and the options for use.

The qualifiers remain a major issue. Measurement is largely unresolved by the classification, and much work remains to be done, to avoid fragmentation in the early years of implementation. Progress is important because of the persisting possibility that some applications, particularly those with large resources, will swamp those that move more slowly or are less adequately resourced. It will be important to build up knowledge about measurement, and its purpose, its method and the impact of the perspective of the measurer. If options (b) or (d) are used for Activities and Participation, then different qualifiers are needed.

This approach, of providing additional qualifiers to delineate Activities and Participation, is the one suggested in this section, in the form of:

This User Guide therefore proposes that Australian users:

A 'test template' for promoting consistent use and recording experience

The ICF should prove invaluable as a conceptual and information-oriented framework for a wide range of applications relating to human functioning. These applications are likely to increase quickly and significantly. The ICF classification has significant implications for national and international data collections, both in terms of the content of the collections and the scope of collections that could be affected.

This section has highlighted a number of areas where the classification allows some flexibility for the user. It is suggested that Australian users take advantage of this flexibility, but also record their experience systematically, so that knowledge can be built and shared rapidly.

Communication is essential to harness and harmonise the rapid progress that is likely to occur. Table 5.3 aims to act as a framework for this communication and promotes :

The goal of such a template is to promote coherent ongoing development, and consistency where it is achievable. The template is structured as a set of suggestions for use and a corresponding 'area for comment'.

It must be emphasised that this template supplements the ICF. It is to be used alongside the ICF, and as a guide in areas where the classification has left some discretion to the user. All material in this section is designed to be consistent with the ICF but to guide the user in areas where flexibility remains.

Table 5.3: A and P options: a recommended template for ICF use and development in Australia

Area of user choice

Suggestion for use in Australia

How to record application

Distinguishing A and P conceptually

Use draft Australian criteria (see Section 5.2) to supplement the ICF.

Comment on the criteria.

Record any refinements for use in a particular area of application.

Area of user choice

Suggestion for use in Australia

How to record application

Use of options
(a) to (d)

We suggest use of options (d) or (b).

If using one of these options, record experience as indicated.

Record and explain the split of domains if option (b) is used.

Use draft Australian qualifiers to delineate A and P (see Sections 5.2 and 7). Record comments and suggestions.

If using option (a), record experience as indicated.

Record:

  • reasons for choice of option (a),

  • what the split of domains is and why it was chosen.

Use of the generic qualifier

If used with option (a), calibrate as indicated.

Calibrate for field of application and explain calibration.

Use of (draft) A and P qualifiers from the NCSDD - see
Section 7

We suggest their use for options (b) or (d).

Calibrate for field of application.

Record comments on use and suggested refinements.

If used for option (a) then record application as shown.

Explain which qualifiers were used and why.

Calibrate for field of application.

Record comments on use and suggested refinements.

Performance, Capacity and Need

 

Record ideas and comments

 

Click on the button below to complete the Activity and Participation template.

                                                       

 Contents