The age and sex profiles of the clients for the different principal drugs of concern varied. For people who received treatment for their own alcohol or drug use in 2020–21:
- where heroin was the principal drug of concern, treatment was most common for people aged over 30 (83% of clients). Where people were aged over 30, 35% were aged 30–39 and 34% were aged 40–49 (Table SC.10)
- over half (52%) of all people receiving treatment for codeine as the principal drug of concern were female clients
- males were 6 times more likely to receive treatment for cocaine as a principal drug of concern than females (84% of episodes for males; 15% for females)
- almost three-quarters (74%) of clients receiving treatment for volatile solvents as a principal drug of concern were Indigenous Australians (Table SC.11).
Usual accommodation type for client
The collection of information about a person’s usual type of accommodation where they lived prior to the start of their AOD treatment, enables AOD services to identify people who may be vulnerable, such as those from custodial settings or people at risk of homelessness. This information may help identify people living in a public place or homeless, supporting the ‘no exit to homelessness’ policy where agencies can only discharge a client to safe, stable housing (Department of Social Services 2020).
Usual accommodation type for the client prior to treatment is reported for selected jurisdictions: New South Wales, Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and the Northern Territory. As data quality improves additional jurisdictional data will be reported. The following analysis includes 59% of all treatment episodes (143,054) (Figure CLIENTS5, Table OV.13).
In 2020–21, treatment episodes reporting the usual accommodation type for AOD clients from New South Wales, Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and the Northern Territory revealed in all selected jurisdictions:
- The most common accommodation prior to the start of treatment was an Independent residential accommodation (e.g., private residence, boarding house, private hotel or informal housing).
- Independent residential accommodation ranged from 59% in the Northern Territory to 87% in Western Australia.
- The Northern Territory reported the highest proportion of episodes with usual accommodation types as custodial (Prison/remand centre/youth training centre) and supported independent living.
- South Australia reported the highest proportion of episodes with usual accommodation types as none/homeless/public place (Figure CLIENTS5; Table OV.13).