Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2021) Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in Australia, 2015–2019, AIHW, Australian Government, accessed 07 July 2022.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2021). Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in Australia, 2015–2019. Retrieved from https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/heart-stroke-vascular-diseases/acute-rheumatic-fever-and-rheumatic-heart-disease
Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in Australia, 2015–2019. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 16 July 2021, https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/heart-stroke-vascular-diseases/acute-rheumatic-fever-and-rheumatic-heart-disease
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in Australia, 2015–2019 [Internet]. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2021 [cited 2022 Jul. 7]. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/heart-stroke-vascular-diseases/acute-rheumatic-fever-and-rheumatic-heart-disease
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) 2021, Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in Australia, 2015–2019, viewed 7 July 2022, https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/heart-stroke-vascular-diseases/acute-rheumatic-fever-and-rheumatic-heart-disease
Get citations as an Endnote file:
PDF | 1.9Mb
This section discusses diagnoses of acute rheumatic fever (ARF) reported by Australian RHD control programs between 2015 and 2019. The total number of ARF notifications recorded is dependent on the reporting practices to the various RHD registers. A person may have multiple diagnoses of ARF in their lifetime, so the number of diagnoses can be greater than the number of people affected. Cases are allocated to a jurisdiction and region based on where they were diagnosed with ARF.
It is likely that ARF notifications are under-reported to RHD registers in all jurisdictions. A report from Agenson et al. (2020) suggests that many cases of patients who attend the hospital for ARF or RHD are not reported to the jurisdictional registers. Although the registers in each state and territory were functional for the entire analysis period, they were relatively new in some states (Box 1). Clinician awareness and reporting to the registers has likely increased in the years since register commencement, and may also have been affected by the addition of ARF and RHD to the list of notifiable diseases at different times in the various jurisdictions. However, under-diagnosis and under-reporting to the register also means some individuals are not captured in this analysis. It is difficult to determine whether increases in the number of notifications reflect a real increase in the number of cases occurring, improved detection and diagnosis of cases, increases in the number of people being recorded on the registers, or a combination of these.
Box 1: Acute rheumatic fever/rheumatic heart disease registers
All jurisdictions with RHD registers have different notification and data collection practices and therefore the numbers, data quality and completeness in the RHD registers are variable. Table 1 summarises the timeline of program and register establishment across the jurisdictions.
Refer to RHD control programs and registers for more information.
Vic, Tas, ACT
RHD control program
Definite ARF notifiable
Probable ARF notifiable
Possible ARF notifiable
Confirmed RHD notifiable
Borderline RHD notifiable
Source: RHD Australia (ARF/RHD writing group) 2020.
We'd love to know any feedback that you have about the AIHW website, its contents or reports.
The browser you are using to browse this website is outdated and some features may not display properly or be accessible to you. Please use a more recent browser for the best user experience.