• Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework
    • Australian Mesothelioma Registry
    • GEN Aged Care Data
    • Housing data
    • Metadata Online Registry (METEOR)
    • Regional Insights for Indigenous Communities
  • Contact us
  • Help & tools
  • Increase text size
  • Decrease text size
Home - Australian Government - Australian Institute of Health and Welfare - logo AIHW - logo
  • Home
  • Reports & data Use down arrow to expand
    Reports & data

    Find reports & data by topic

    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • H
    • I
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • P
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • T
    • U
    • V
    • W
    • X
    • Y
    • Z
    See all topics
    • Latest releases
    • Educational resources

    Featured

    • Australia's health
    • Australia's welfare
    • Australia's health performance
    • Hospitals
    • Australia’s Disability Strategy
    • Linked data assets
    • First Nations people
    • Suicide & self-harm monitoring
    • Family, domestic & sexual violence
    • Australian Centre for Monitoring Population Health
  • About our data Use down arrow to expand
    About our data
    • Our data collections
    • AIHW data by geography
    • AIHW data by indicators
    • AIHW data by sex and gender
    • Accessing data through the AIHW
    • Data governance
    • Other government data
    • AIHW linked data assets
    • Statistical terms and concepts
    • Vulnerability and disclosure policy
  • Our services Use down arrow to expand
    Our services
    • Data integration
    • Metadata support
    • Validata
    • Ethical (HREC) review
  • About us Use down arrow to expand
    About us
    • Our role & organisation goals
    • Our people & structure
    • Our governance
    • Our committees
    • Our impact
    • Our international role
    • Careers
    • Corporate publications
    • Freedom of Information
    • Gifts & benefits register
    • Modern slavery
    • Privacy
    • Public interest disclosure
    • Reporting suspected fraud
    • Scam warning
    • Submissions to inquiries
    • Tenders
  • Newsroom Use down arrow to expand
    Newsroom
    • Media releases
    • Latest news & events
    • Upcoming releases
    • Our podcast – Behind the data
    • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework
    • Australian Mesothelioma Registry
    • GEN Aged Care Data
    • Housing data
    • Metadata Online Registry (METEOR)
    • Regional Insights for Indigenous Communities
  • Contact us
  • Help & tools
  • Increase text size
  • Decrease text size
You are here: Home Reports & data Aged care Pathways in aged care: do people follow recommendations? Related material
You are here:Go to Aged care
Share via Facebook Share via Twitter Share via Linkedin Share via email

Pathways in aged care: do people follow recommendations?

Publication
Release Date: 01 Sep 2011
Topic: Aged care
Media release

Citation

AIHW (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare) (2011) Pathways in aged care: do people follow recommendations?, AIHW, Australian Government, accessed 24 June 2026.

Get citation (EndNote)

PDF | 1.1MB

Other formats

Download publication
Download PDF

Eligibility for key aged care programs is assessed by Aged Care Assessment Teams (ACATs). These teams also make recommendations on the preferred long-term setting for receiving care; that is, in the person's home or in a residential care facility. Analysis shows that there was considerable variation in care pathways within recommendation group. Rates of transition into permanent residential care varied with the use of community care and residential respite care. One-quarter of ACAT clients-including some recommended to live in residential care-did not use aged care services in the 2 years after their first assessment.

  • ISSN: 1446-9820
  • ISBN: 978-1-74249-183-7
  • Cat. no: AUS 137
  • Pages: 28
Findings from this report:
  • 60% of the cohort were recommended to live in the community, with remainder recommended for residential aged care

  • Overall, 29% were in hospital at the time of their assessment

  • Two-fifths (41%) of the cohort had used at least one aged care program within 1 month of the assessment

  • 7% had used all 3 programs (community-based care and permanent and respite residential aged care) in the 2 years

Show navigation
Skip to page content
Back to topic
  • Contents
    • Summary
    • PDF table of contents
  • Formats
  • Related material

Related material

Latest related reports

  • Comparing an SLK-based and a name-based data linkage strategy: an investigation into the PIAC linkage

    Publication | 23 Feb 2011

  • Pathways in Aged Care: program use after assessment

    Publication | 02 Feb 2011

  • Dementia and the take-up of residential respite care

    Publication | 21 Apr 2010

  • Dementia and the take-up of residential respite care: an analysis using the PIAC cohort

    Publication | 21 Apr 2010

  • Incorporating HACC use into aged care pathways: a technical report for the PIAC project

    Publication | 17 Aug 2009

Related topics

  • Aged care

Last updated 11/08/2023 v1.0

AIHW

  • About us
  • Our committees
  • Our governance
  • Our reports
  • Our data
  • Newsroom

Using AIHW

  • Accessibility
  • Copyright
  • Disclaimer
  • Freedom of Information
  • Indexed list of files
  • Privacy
  • Site map
  • Vulnerability and disclosure policy

Quick links

  • Home
  • AIHW Ethics Committee
  • Careers
  • Crisis and support services
  • Our data collections
  • Data integration
  • Data on request
  • Login

Connect with us

Connect with AIHW on LinkedIn Follow AIHW on Instagram Visit AIHW on YouTube

© Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2026

Creative Commons

Search

Keep typing to see search results...

Sorry, we couldn't find any results matching

To help find what you're looking for:

  • Check your spelling and try again
  • using a more general term
  • keep your search term short and simple
  • try looking in A-Z topics

Other ways to browse

A-Z Topics

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z

Close

Feedback

We'd love to know any feedback that you have about the AIHW website, its contents or reports.

Required fields

The browser you are using to browse this website is outdated and some features may not display properly or be accessible to you. Please use a more recent browser for the best user experience.