Pedal cyclist hospitalisations: estimating on-road cases
Publication
Release Date:
Topic: Injury
Citation
AIHW
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2021) Pedal cyclist hospitalisations: estimating on-road cases, AIHW, Australian Government, accessed 06 December 2023. doi:10.25816/jmtv-4954
APA
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2021). Pedal cyclist hospitalisations: estimating on-road cases. Canberra: AIHW.
MLA
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Pedal cyclist hospitalisations: estimating on-road cases. AIHW, 2021.
Vancouver
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Pedal cyclist hospitalisations: estimating on-road cases. Canberra: AIHW; 2021.
Harvard
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2021, Pedal cyclist hospitalisations: estimating on-road cases, AIHW, Canberra.
PDF | 950Kb
This report compares the use of different criteria to distinguish between pedal cyclist hospitalised injury cases occurring in on-road and off-road settings. The Traffic method overestimates on-road cases because a coding rule requires that cases where place of occurrence is unspecified should be coded as occurring ‘in traffic’, while the Place method likely underestimates on-road cases because some cases with unspecified place of occurrence will have occurred on-road. Ways to improve delineation between on-road and off-road cases are proposed.
- ISSN: 1444-3791
- ISBN: 978-1-76054-892-6
- DOI: 10.25816/jmtv-4954
- Cat. no: INJCAT221
- Pages: 48
Findings from this report:
-
Place of occurrence coding rules may adversely affect estimates of hospitalisations for cyclist on-road injuries
-
Hospitalisation estimates for cyclist on-road injuries are overestimates when based on the Traffic model
-
When based on the Place model, hospitalisation estimates for cyclist on-road injuries are underestimates