Indicators, describing the nature and extent of health dimensions across regions and time, provide a systematic set of measures which can inform rural health policy. In 2003, a Rural Health Information Framework was established to aid the understanding of, and to monitor the health of regional and remote populations. Indicators were identified across three areas: health status and outcomes; health determinants; and health system performance. This report is the second in an AIHW series, which reports on indicators of health from a regional and remote perspective. Indicators of health status and determinants of health are published here. A complementary report focusing on indicators of health system performance is scheduled for publication in mid–2008.
- Rates of self-reported diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, coronary heart disease, depression, and anxiety were generally similar for those living in Major Cities and those living in regional and remote areas.
- Compared with those living in Major Cities, the incidence of cancer was slightly higher for those living in regional areas and slightly lower for those living in Very Remote areas in the two years 2001–03.
- People in regional and remote areas were more likely than those in Major Cities to report an acute or chronic injury, to drink alcohol in quantities risking harm in the short term, or to be overweight or obese.
- Compared with people living in Major Cities, people living in regional and remote areas were less likely to consume low-fat or skim milk or to consume the recommended two serves of fruit per day. However, they were more likely to consume four or more serves of vegetables per day.
- Lower birthweights outside Major Cities were particularly marked for teenage mothers (those aged younger than 20 years).
- Life expectancy decreases with increasing remoteness. Compared with Major Cities, the life expectancy in regional areas is 1–2 years lower and in remote areas is up to 7 years lower.
- Compared with those in Major Cities, people in regional and remote areas were less likely to report very good or excellent health.
- Across all geographic areas, the health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples was generally worse than non-Indigenous Australians. The higher proportion of Indigenous Australians in remote area populations contributes to, but does not completely account for, the generally poorer health of people living in remote areas.
- Indigenous Australians were generally less likely to report consumption of two serves of fruit and four or more serves of vegetables per day and more likely to report food insecurity than all people in Major Cities.
- Compared with their Major City counterparts, males were more likely to show high to very high levels of psychological distress in Outer Regional and remote areas.
- Compared with their Major City counterparts, females had higher fertility rates in all regional and remote areas.
- Purpose, scope and structure of this report
- Defining regional and remote
- Data methodology and interpretation
Health status and outcomes
- Health conditions
- Human function dimension
- Life expectancy and wellbeing dimension
- Determinants of health
Appendix A - Statistical methods
Appendix B - Data sources
Appendix C - Rural Health Information Framework
End matter (105KB PDF): References; List of tables; List of figures