Development of a national data collection
Introduction
Following the scoping and feasibility project, the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing further funded the AIHW, through an Official Order, to progress the development of a data collection, in the form of a National Best Endeavours Data Set (NBEDS) for newborn hearing screening. A summary of the status of all activities in this project are outlined in Table 1 and further detail on each of these activities are provided below.
| Activities | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
1a. Establishment of an advisory committee to:
| Complete | The National Neonatal Hearing Screening Data Development Committee, chaired by the AIHW, was established in October 2023. All state and territory departments responsible for newborn hearing screening are represented on the data development committee to ensure national agreement and consistency. The committee met formally three times and collaborated on 2 out-of-session consultation papers. |
1b. Agreement on the scope of the data collection: In consultation with the advisory committee, AIHW will define and gain agreement on what the NBEDS will include and exclude.
| Complete | The scope of the data collection, with inclusion and exclusion criteria has been agreed by the data development committee. 21 data items have been agreed for inclusion in the initial NBEDS by the data development committee. Data standards have been developed to accompany the data items. |
| 1c. Agreement of definitions and collection methods for data items to be included in a national collection, by the advisory committee. | Partially complete | The data development committee reached agreement on definitions of data items in August 2024. Specifics on collection methods are yet to be discussed, pending the next phase of development of the data collection. |
| 1d. Revision of the national performance indicators: to align with the revised National Framework | In progress, in collaboration with the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing | Development of the NBEDS has sought to align with the proposed reporting under the National Framework for Newborn Hearing Screening. This report outlines feasibility of reporting against the newborn hearing screening indicators (1–4). Further development and feasibility assessment are required for indicators related to audiology, amplification and implantation services and early intervention. |
| 1e. Preparation for Authoritative endorsement of the NBEDS by the National Health Data and Information Standards Committee (NHDISC). | In progress | The data specifications have been agreed to by the data development committee. They will require formal approval from National Health Data and Information Standards Committee and input into the AIHW’S metadata register METEOR. |
Note: Activities 1a and 1b were agreed actions under the Official Order. Activities 1c, 1d and 1e were not bound as deliverables.
Establishment of an advisory committee
In October 2023, the National Newborn Hearing Screening Data Development Committee (the data development committee) was established. This committee is chaired by the AIHW and includes representatives from each state and territory department responsible for newborn hearing screening to ensure national agreement and consistency. A summary of each meeting and outcomes is outlined in Table 2.
| Meeting date | Key outcomes |
|---|---|
| 18 October 2023 | Terms of reference were endorsed. Feedback on proposed NBEDS scope and data items were obtained. |
| 28 March 2024* | Committee provided out-of-session comment on the proposed data specifications for the NBEDS. |
| 5 June 2024 | Refined scope of the NBEDS, detailed data specifications and definitions were discussed. |
| 3 July 2024* | Committee provided out-of-session feedback on the revised data specifications for the NBEDS. |
| 21 August 2024 | Final scope, detailed data specifications and definitions were agreed for inclusion in the NBEDS. |
* Note: These outcomes were progressed out-of-session.
Developing a national data collection
A national data collection is an agreed set of specifications to collect data for a particular purpose. A successful national data collection requires consistency and standardisation in data collection methods and agreed definitions.
These standardised specifications, known as ‘metadata’, ensure that services and jurisdictions are collecting the same data and are using it in the same way. The metadata endorsed for use across Australia are referred to as ‘data standards’. These standards improve the quality, relevance, consistency and availability of national information. They describe the expected meaning and recommended representation of data for use within a defined context.
Consistent content and standard definitions for the collection of information means that users can then understand and compare the data, regardless of how these data are collected or stored across different organisations and jurisdictions. Data standards also help reduce the duplication of data. They provide a common and consistent platform for organisations to work from and simplify the data development process by reusing standards that already exist. This makes the adoption and implementation of the standards easier across all jurisdictions. These standards are critical for the development and implementation of policies for improving health and welfare outcomes for all Australians. There are different types of data sets that are each defined based upon the degree to which data provision is mandated (see Box 1).
Box 1: Types of data sets
A National Best Endeavours Data Set (NBEDS) is a metadata set for which there is a commitment to provide data nationally on a ‘best endeavours’ basis but is not formally mandated for national collection. When data quality, comparability, and universal coverage are achieved, a business case is made to the advisory committee and then the National Health Data and Information Standards Committee, for these data items to become mandatory for collection.
A National Minimum Data Set (NMDS) is a metadata set which specifies a minimum set of data elements which must be collected and reported across Australia. There must be national agreement for the NMDS to collect uniform data and to supply it as part of the mandatory national collection.
For more information see Data set specifications, AIHW 2024
The previous scoping report (AIHW 2023) recommended that data development work be undertaken to form a National Best Endeavours Data Set (NBEDS) on newborn hearing screening set that captures, as a minimum, information on newborn demographic and hearing screening and can be built upon to include additional data (such as audiological assessment and early intervention) in the future. The work to develop the NBEDS commenced with defining an agreed scope for the collection.
Scope of the NBEDS
The previous scoping report (AIHW 2023) recommended the scope for a national newborn hearing screening data collection would include unit-record data on all liveborn babies in each Australian state and territory.
Including all liveborn babies would enable reporting on how many babies were eligible for screening, how many were screened, how many declined screening, and how many were not offered screening. It would also allow for comparison to the number of babies born in Australia each year, as collected in the National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC).
It was also recommended that, at a minimum, the initial national data collection should include information on:
- Demographics: including baby’s Indigenous status, sex, date of birth, geographical area of usual residence and gestational age at birth
- Screening: including the number of screens, dates of screening, outcomes and, where applicable, reason screening was not performed.
During the current project phase, the scope was further refined and agreed to by the data development committee. It was agreed the scope of the data set would include:
- Unit record data on all liveborn babies – babies of at least 20 weeks’ gestation or 400 grams in birth weight in Australia, in hospitals, birth centres and the community. The Australian national health data dictionary defines a ‘live birth’ as the complete expulsion or extraction from its mother of a baby, of any gestation, that shows signs of life.
- Stillbirths are excluded from this collection.
Data for the newborn hearing screening NBEDS would initially be provided to the AIHW by each state and territory department responsible for newborn hearing screening on a best endeavours (voluntary) basis, to form the national dataset.
Eligibility for newborn screening
All efforts are made to maximise participation in newborn hearing screening in Australia, taking into consideration baby’s medical suitability and parental consent to undertake screening activities.
Babies considered eligible or ineligible for screening could be distinguished using the proposed NBEDS. For national reporting, ‘eligible babies’ could be defined using the National Framework criteria or a jurisdictional-based approach could be adopted, where babies are deemed eligible according to each state and territory program protocols. Eligibility criteria according to the National Framework and jurisdictional programs are outlined below.
National eligibility criteria for newborn hearing screening programs
The National Framework for Newborn Hearing Screening (Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, 2025) outlines a proposed national scope of newborn hearing screening:
Eligibility: All babies of at least 34 weeks’ gestation and up to 6 months of age are eligible for newborn hearing screening, except for those that are unsuitable for screening.
Exclusions/Unsuitable for Screening: Some babies may be deemed unsuitable for screening and therefore excluded from newborn hearing screening. These include babies that:
- have microtia or atresia (infants with congenital aural atresia in one or both ears or with visible pinna/ear canal deformity such as stenosis or severe malformation are instead referred immediately for diagnostic audiologic evaluation)
- are medically unwell
- are stillborn or have died.
The National Framework states that reason(s) why infants are excluded from newborn hearing screening will be recorded in accordance with jurisdiction procedures.
State and territory newborn hearing screening programs’ eligibility criteria
Future national reporting would need to consider jurisdictional differences in the scope of newborn hearing screening programs, which can differ from the nationally proposed scope under the National Framework. The NBEDS items will enable differentiation of eligible/ineligible babies and can account for jurisdictional differences. Jurisdictional differences in eligibility criteria are summarised in Table 3.
State or territory newborn hearing screening program | Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria | Unsuitable for screening |
|---|---|---|---|
NSW | Statewide Infant Screening - Hearing (SWISH) Program:
Note: The NSW Health SWISH Program aims to complete newborn hearing screening to eligible babies by one month of age, identify babies born with congenital permanent childhood hearing impairment by 3 months of age and facilitate access to appropriate amplification and early intervention by 6 months of age. Screening can be completed up to 6 months of age. | Stillborn. Neonatal death prior to newborn hearing screening. Note that the NSW Policy Directive is still being reviewed and there may be additional exclusion criteria. Screening should not be performed on babies less than gestational age of 34 weeks. | Babies with confirmed bacterial meningitis. Babies with microtia or atresia. Babies who remain medically unfit to screen at 3 months of age (corrected age). |
Vic | Babies greater than 34 weeks and less than 6 months. At least 4–6 hours old. After treatments (vents, ototoxic meds) have ceased and ready for discharge. Babies with known neurological conditions or compromised skin– discussed on case-by-case basis to decide direct refer or screen and refer. | Non live births. | Babies with Microtia/atresia are directly referred. Babies with a pacemaker or programable implant need to be directly referred. |
Qld | Live births, older than 34 weeks gestational age (ideally <1 month corrected age), are eligible to participate in the Healthy Hearing screening program. Include deceased as eligible. | – | Note that hearing screening is not performed on the following and these bypass screening with direct refer to audiology:
|
WA* | Greater than 34 weeks gestational age and less than six months. Above 1500 grams. After treatments (vents, ototoxic meds) have ceased and ready for discharge. Medically stable. Asleep or in a quiet settled state. Have normal outer-ear anatomy in at least one ear and no major craniofacial anomalies that could impact on the screen (babies with microtia or atresia are included in newborn hearing screening). | It is medically inadvisable to attach the sensors and/or ear couplers, such as to compromised skin. Major craniofacial anomaly exists. Other conditions exist, which are deemed unsuitable for screening by medical staff and require a full diagnostic assessment by Audiology. | Occasional cases when the baby is receiving palliative care and the family and medical team have advised against screening. |
SA | Includes babies >34 weeks gestation. | Babies <34 weeks. | Babies with microtia or atresia. |
TAS |
| Babies <32 weeks. | Babies with microtia or atresia. |
ACT | Babies >34 weeks gestation. | – | Babies deemed medically unfit (usually due to a neurological issue or severe skin condition). |
NT | Babies ≥35 weeks’ gestation. Screening may be delayed post 35 weeks for any number of medical reasons, but we would aim to screen all babies who meet that milestone. | Occasional cases where babies are not screened because it is clear the baby is only receiving short term palliative care – often these babies have neurological conditions, sometimes not. | Babies with severe neurological conditions. Babies with ear canal atresia or pinna. |
* Note: Maternity hospital staff undertake screening at WA’s public hospitals and the program coordinator, Child and Adolescent Health Service on behalf of the WA Department of Health, currently contract a private entity, the Earbus Foundation of WA, to undertake screening in private hospitals.
Data items for development
The scoping report (AIHW 2023) recommended there was sufficient interest and data availability to develop a national data collection that should initially focus on capturing demographic and screening information and could be built upon in future to include data on audiological assessment, risk factors, and early intervention.
As a result,16 demographic and screening data items were originally proposed for development to form the NBEDS at the first meeting of the data development committee in October 2023. These items were further developed, refined and discussed with the data development committee between March and August 2024. Some items were removed due to feasibility issues and others were added to establish a more complete collection.
The status of the items is outlined in Table 4.
Data item | Data item topic | Rationale for inclusion | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
State or territory identifier (baby) | Demographic | Identifier for each baby that is unique within a state/territory screening program. Allows for checking that records are unique and enables the AIHW to query records back to the state/territory. Where possible, having the same identifier as provided to the National Perinatal Data Collection would allow for future linkage (noting the correct ethics and consent requirements would need to be fulfilled prior to linkage being undertaken). | Retained for inclusion in the NBEDS. |
State or territory of birth (baby) Birth event – state/territory of birth, code N (aihw.gov.au) | Demographic | Provides demographic information. | Retained for inclusion in the NBEDS. |
Sex (baby) | Demographic | Provides demographic information. | Retained for inclusion in the NBEDS. |
Date of birth (baby) | Demographic | Allows for calculation of chronological age. | Retained for inclusion in the NBEDS. |
Gestational age (baby) Product of conception – gestational age, total completed weeks N[N] (aihw.gov.au) | Demographic | Allows for the calculation of corrected age (that is, a premature baby's chronological age minus the number of weeks or months early they were born). | Retained for inclusion in the NBEDS. |
Indigenous status (baby) | Demographic | This item, when used in conjunction with the mother’s Indigenous status, is a baseline measure of health for Indigenous children. | Retained for inclusion in the NBEDS. |
Indigenous status (mother) | Demographic | Indigenous status of mothers is a key data resource for assessing antenatal care in pregnancy and other interventions before or during pregnancy, aimed at improving the health of mothers and babies. | Removed: this item is not commonly collected as part of newborn hearing screening data. Capture of baby’s Indigenous status was considered to have primary importance for this collection. |
Statistical Area Level 2 (SA2) of usual residence (mother) | Demographic | Used for geographical analysis (for example remoteness, socioeconomic status). SA2 is the preferred data element to be used for geographical analysis (postcode should only be used when SA2 is not available). SA2 can be geocoded within state/territory health departments using the client’s address. | Retained for inclusion in the NBEDS. |
Postcode of usual residence (mother) Address – Australian postcode, code (Postcode datafile) NNNN (aihw.gov.au) | Demographic | May be used for geographical analysis (for example remoteness, socioeconomic status), however SA2 is preferred. | Retained for inclusion in the NBEDS. |
State or territory of screen | Hearing screening | State/territory where screen was performed as this may occasionally differ from state/territory of birth. | Retained and developed during the current project phase. |
Date of screen (date of screen 1, screen 2 & screen 3) | Hearing screening | Allows for calculation of age at screening. Collecting data on the date and outcome for all screens performed (where an infant undergoes more than 1 screen) could be beneficial in providing data on the number of screens performed, informing resourcing and any variation in screening outcomes over multiple screens. | Revised; further developed during the current project phase. Revisions included:
|
Screen outcome (Screen outcome 1, Screen outcome 2 & Screen outcome 3) | Hearing screening | Collecting data on the date and outcome for all screens performed (where an infant undergoes more than 1 screen) could be beneficial in providing data on the number of screens performed, informing resourcing and any variation in screening outcomes over multiple screens. | Revised; further developed during the current project phase. Revisions included:
|
Overall outcome of screening | Hearing screening | Provides a determination of the overall outcome of the screening process according to the following categories: 1. Complete, discharged from screening 2. Complete, referred for targeted follow-up 3. Complete, referred for audiological assessment 4. Bypass, non-screening pathway 5. Screening in process 6. Incomplete 9. Not stated/inadequately described Enables the calculation of the proportion of eligible babies that have completed screening by 30 days of age (corrected). | New item added in the current project phase. |
Date of hearing screening completion | Hearing screening | Screening completion date enables the calculation of the proportion of eligible babies that have completed screening by 30 days of age (corrected). | New item added in the current project phase. Agreed to be collected in DDMMYYYY format. |
Reason not screened | Hearing screening | Provides an overview of why some babies are unable to be screened: 1. Declined 2. Missed screening 3. Moved interstate 4. Medical exclusion 5. Hearing screen bypass 6. Baby deceased 7. Ineligible 8. Other 9. Not stated/ inadequately described | Revised and further developed during the current project phase. Revisions included:
|
Referral outcome | Hearing screening | This item captures the referral from the jurisdictional newborn hearing screening program within the following categories: 1. Referral following positive screen 2. Referral following negative screen 3. Referral without screening 4. No referral required 5. No referral provided 9. Not stated/inadequately described | New item added in the current project phase. Will aid in the calculation of the National Framework indicator: Proportion of babies that require referral to audiological assessment are referred within 3 business days of screening. |
Date of referral | Hearing screening | This item captures the date in which the newborn has been referred from the jurisdictional hearing screening program. | New item added in the current project phase. Will aid in the calculation of the National Framework indicator: Proportion of babies that require referral to audiological assessment are referred within 3 business days of screening. |
Referral type | Hearing screening | This item captures the type of service the referral was made (from the jurisdictional hearing screening program) within the following categories: 1. Audiologist: audiological assessment 2. Audiologist: targeted follow-up 7. Other 9. Not stated/inadequately described | New item added in the current project phase. Will provide context to the National Framework indicator: Proportion of babies that require referral to audiological assessment are referred within 3 business days of screening. |
Data items for future development
In October 2023, the data development committee agreed that data items on diagnostic audiological assessment were not feasible for current reporting due to inconsistencies in data availability. However, it was noted that these items could be reassessed at a later stage of data development.
Depending on data quality, data from audiological assessment services could enable reporting on the number of babies who receive an audiological diagnosis, by screening outcome, diagnosis type(s) and age. Time between hearing screening completion to audiology assessment commence/complete date could also be explored. Further detail on these potential items is outlined in Table 5.
Data item | Status |
|---|---|
Date of diagnostic audiological assessment | Not included, requires further development. |
Diagnostic audiological assessment outcome | Not included, requires further development. |
Date of audiological diagnosis completion | Not included, requires further development. |
Type and degree of hearing loss | Not included, requires further development. |
Note: The inclusion of data items regarding diagnostic audiological assessment in a national data set could allow for the calculation of the number of infants who returned a positive screen who complete audiological assessment, the timing in which this is completed, and diagnosis outcomes, including the type and degree of hearing loss.
Data items for future (medium to long term) development
Data items on more detailed demographics, amplification, implantation, early intervention, risk factors (and potential linkage identifiers) should also be considered for future development.
Depending on data quality, data from these items would enable a more complete picture of the patient characteristics, journey and outcomes along the hearing pathway. Given the data quality and availability of these items are largely unknown (or held outside existing established newborn hearing screening collections), these data items would require a longer lead time to develop and include in a national collection. Further detail on these potential items is outlined in Table 6.
Data item | Rationale | Status |
|---|---|---|
Name (baby) | May be considered for future development to enable linkage with other data collections. The collection of this data item is currently inconsistent nationally. Newborns are often considered a difficult cohort to collect this type of information for as they are often screened and discharged from hospital prior to their name being recorded (often being recorded instead as “baby of <mother’s name>” in most screening databases). Use of client identifiers such as the Statistical Linkage Key ‘SLK-581’ which includes 3 letters of family name, 2 letters of given name, date of birth and sex) may be considered if robust client demographics can be collected. | Not included, requires further development. |
Name (mother) | May be considered for future development to enable linkage with other data collections. | Not included, requires further development. |
Address (mother/baby) | May be considered for future development to enable linkage with other data collections. | Not included, requires further development. |
Medicare number (mother/baby) | May be considered for future development to enable linkage with other data collections. This data item is predominantly unavailable in state and territory screening databases. | Not included, requires further development. |
Culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) identifier (mother) | The collection of CALD data across jurisdiction’s screening databases is limited, with information collected usually around the mother’s primary spoken language and/or whether an interpreter is required. These are not currently considered to be a good indicator of a person’s CALD background. More beneficial data would likely be sourced using linked data in future (for example country of birth data from the Census), which is often used to supplement information in data sets that do not collect this information. | Not included, requires further development. |
Risk factors | May be considered for future development. Risk factors can include a family history of hearing impairment, exposure to congenital infections or ototoxic medications, and syndromes associated with hearing loss, such as Down syndrome. Data items on the prevalence and monitoring of infants with these risk factors and their outcomes should also be considered for inclusion in a national data collection to enable research into risk factors and health outcomes associated with permanent congenital hearing impairment. | Not included, requires further development. |
Early intervention Could include:
| May be considered for future development. Data on engagement with early intervention services is poorly collected nationally, with 7 of 8 jurisdictions reporting no, or extremely limited, data. Most jurisdictions advised that these data are not usually provided back to the state and territory programs by the early intervention service providers. Further data development work would need to be undertaken to establish the most appropriate source(s) of these data (for example, sourcing data directly from the early intervention services may need to be considered). Data sources may include NDIS. | Not included, requires further development. |
Amplification services data
| Data could potentially be sourced from Hearing Australia. | Not included, requires further development. |
Implantation services
| Cochlear implants, bone conduction implants (surgical and non-surgical) and middle ear implants are some examples of implantable hearing devices. Hearing Australia do provide bone conduction devices to eligible people and may hold relevant data. Hearing Australia do not perform cochlear implant evaluation or surgery but do provide support and have a close relationship with cochlear implant clinics. The relevant data holdings for cochlear implants would require further exploration. | Not included, requires further development. |
Agreed newborn hearing screening data items
A summary of the 21 agreed newborn hearing screening data items for the NBEDS are provided in Table 7. All items relate to the newborn hearing screening component of the pathway and have been agreed in-principle by the data development committee at their August 2024 meeting. Where current standardised metadata exist, a link to the standard in METEOR is provided.
Data item name | Data item topic | Data item information |
|---|---|---|
1. Person identifier (baby) | Demographic | Definition: Identifier for each baby that is unique within a state/territory screening program. Permissible values: 2–20 characters long. This can be a combination of alphanumeric characters and dashes (-). METEOR identifier: 290046 Guide for use:
|
2. State or territory of birth (baby) | Demographic | Definition: The state or territory in which a baby was delivered, as represented by a code. Permissible values: 1. New South Wales 2. Victoria 3. Queensland 4, South Australia 5. Western Australia 6. Tasmania 7. Northern Territory 8. Australian Capital Territory 9. Other 99. Not stated/inadequately described METEOR identifier: 718242 Guide for use:
|
3. Date of birth (baby) | Demographic | Definition: The date of birth of the person, expressed as DDMMYYYY. Permissible values: DDMMYYYY METEOR identifier: 287007 Guide for use:
If the date is not unknown and cannot be estimated, it can be recorded as 99999999. |
4. Gestational age at birth (baby) | Demographic | Definition: The gestational age of a baby in completed weeks. Permissible values:
METEOR identifier: 695332 Guide for use:
|
5. Sex (baby) | Demographic | Definition: The sex of a person, as represented by a code. Permissible values: 1. Male 2. Female 3. Another term 9. Not stated/inadequately described METEOR identifier: 741686 Guide for use:
CODE 1 – Male Persons whose sex at birth or infancy was recorded as male, or who reported their sex as male at the time of collection. CODE 2 – Female Persons whose sex at birth or infancy was recorded as female, or who reported their sex as female at the time of collection. CODE 3 – Another term Persons whose sex at birth or infancy was recorded as another term (not male or female), or who reported their sex as another term (not male or female) at the time of collection. The value meaning of "Another term" has been assigned to Code 3 for this value domain, which replaces "Other" and "Intersex or indeterminate" in previous versions of this element. The third option recognises that across Australian jurisdictions and elsewhere there are a range of terms used. CODE 9 – Not stated/inadequately described This supplementary value is used to code inadequately described responses and non-responses for sex. It is not to be used on primary collection forms. It is primarily for use in administrative collections when transferring data from data sets where the item has not been collected.
|
6. Indigenous status (baby) | Demographic | Definition: Whether a person identifies as being of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander origin, as represented by a code. Permissible values: 1. Aboriginal but not Torres Strait Islander Origin 2. Torres Strait Islander but not Aboriginal origin 3. Both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin 4. Neither Aboriginal nor Torres Strait Islander origin Supplementary values: 9. Not stated/inadequately described METEOR identifier: 602543 Guide for use:
|
7. Statistical Area Level 2 (SA2) of usual residence (mother) | Demographic | Definition: The geographical region in which a person or group of people usually reside, as represented by a statistical area level 2 (SA2) code. Permissible values: Components of SA2: State, SA4, SA3, SA2. METEOR identifier: 747315 Guide for use:
|
8. Postcode of usual residence (mother) | Demographic | Definition: The Australian numeric descriptor for a postal delivery area for an address. Permissible values:
METEOR identifier: 611398 Guide for use:
|
9. State or territory of screen | Hearing screening | Definition: State or territory where the current hearing screen was performed, as represented by a code. Permissible values: 1. New South Wales 2. Victoria 3. Queensland 4.South Australia 5. Western Australia 6. Tasmania 7. Northern Territory 8. Australian Capital Territory 9. Not stated/inadequately described METEOR identifier: 718228 Guide for use: State of screen relates to the baby.
|
10. Date of first completed screen | Hearing screening | Definition: The date in which the newborn has been screened for possible hearing loss for the first time, expressed as DDMMYYYY. Permissible values: DDMMYYYY METEOR identifier: 270566 Guide for use: Date of screen relates to the baby.
|
11. Outcome of first completed screen | Hearing screening | Definition: Whether a baby tested positive (refer) either unilaterally or bilaterally or negative (pass) for possible hearing loss on the first screen, as represented by a code. Permissible values: 1. Pass (negative) 2. Unilateral refer (positive) 3. Bilateral refer (positive) 4. Not Screened 9. Not stated/inadequately described METEOR identifier: to be developed Guide for use: Outcome of completed screens relate to the baby.
|
12. Date of second completed screen | Hearing screening | Definition: The date in which the newborn has been screened for possible hearing loss for a second time, expressed as DDMMYYYY. Permissible values: DDMMYYYY METEOR identifier: 270566 Guide for use:
|
13. Outcome of second completed screen | Hearing screening | Definition: Whether a baby tested positive (refer) either unilaterally or bilaterally or negative (pass) for possible hearing loss on the second screen, as represented by a code. Permissible values: 1. Pass (negative) 2. Unilateral refer (positive) 3. Bilateral refer (positive) 4. Not Screened 9. Not stated/inadequately described METEOR identifier: to be developed Guide for use:
|
14. Date of third completed screen | Hearing screening | Definition: The date in which the newborn has been screened for possible hearing loss for the third time, expressed as DDMMYYYY. Permissible values: DDMMYYYY METEOR identifier: 270566 Guide for use:
|
15. Outcome of third completed screen | Hearing screening | Definition: Whether a baby tested positive (refer) or negative (pass) for possible hearing loss on the third screen, as represented by a code. Permissible values: 1. Pass (negative) 2. Unilateral refer (positive) 3. Bilateral refer (positive) 4. Not Screened 9. Not stated/inadequately described METEOR identifier: to be developed. Guide for use:
|
16. Overall outcome of screening | Hearing screening | Definition: The outcome of the newborn hearing screening process, as represented by a code. Permissible values: 1. Complete, discharged from screening 2. Complete, referred for targeted follow-up 3. Complete, referred for audiological assessment 4. Bypass, non-screening pathway 5. Screening in process 6. Incomplete 9. Not stated/inadequately described METEOR identifier: to be developed. Guide for use:
|
17. Date of hearing screening completion | Hearing screening | Definition: The date in which the baby has completed hearing screening expressed as DDMMYYYY. Permissible values: DDMMYYYY METEOR identifier: 270566 Guide for use: Screening completion date relates to the baby.
|
18. Primary reason not screened or completed | Hearing screening | Definition: The primary reason why a baby was not screened or where screening was incomplete, as represented by a code. Permissible values: 1. Declined 2. Missed screening 3. Moved interstate 4. Medical exclusion 5. Hearing screen bypass 6. Baby deceased 7. Ineligible 8. Other 9. Not stated/ inadequately described METEOR identifier: to be developed. Guide for use: Reasons not screened relate to the baby. If multiple reasons are known, only the main reason to be recorded. |
19. Referral outcome | Hearing screening | Definition: The outcome of the referral from the jurisdictional hearing screening program, as represented by a code. Permissible values: 1. Referral following positive screen 2. Referral following negative screen 3. Referral without screening 4. No referral required 5. No referral provided 9. Not stated/inadequately described METEOR identifier: to be developed. Guide for use: Referral outcome relates to the baby. |
20. Date of referral | Hearing screening | Definition: The date in which the newborn has been referred from the jurisdictional hearing screening program, expressed as DDMMYYYY. Permissible values: DDMMYYYY METEOR identifier: 270566 Guide for use:
|
21. Referral type | Hearing screening | Definition: The type of service the referral was made (from the jurisdictional hearing screening program). Permissible values: 1. Audiologist: audiological assessment 2. Audiologist: targeted follow-up 7. Other 9. Not stated/inadequately described METEOR identifier: to be developed. Guide for use:
|
Note: Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Western Australia’s public program and the Northern Territory perform a third screen where babies obtain ‘flip-flop’ results in the first 2 screens. Third screens can also be performed for other reasons.
Figure 2 below demonstrates how the agreed data items fit within the newborn hearing screening pathway.
Figure 2: NBEDS DATA items within the newborn hearing screening pathway

* Note: Screen completion date (17) can be derived at this point.
A diagram that provides an overview of newborn babies' hearing screening pathways, including:
- the process through which eligible newborn babies can progress through a maximum of three hearing screens
- the reasons for which babies are not screened or able to have screening completed
The diagram outlines how each of the proposed data items fit within the newborn hearing screening process.
This includes a summary of the scope of the collection and the demographic and geographic information collected.
Definitions of data items
To accompany the data specifications, a comprehensive glossary was also developed (see Glossary). Glossary items were developed to align with existing data standards, where these existed. New newborn hearing-specific definitions were developed collaboratively with the data development committee to ensure they aligned with current jurisdictional policy and practice.
Collection methodology
Although the specific collection methodology is yet to be finalised, it was agreed that jurisdictions would provide unit-record level data to the AIHW on a best endeavours (voluntary) basis for national collection and reporting.
The AIHW recommends that the frequency of the collection be annual, at minimum. Further feasibility assessment and discussion with the data development committee would be required to determine collection frequency and the specific methodology for data provision.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2023) Environmental scan and assessment of the feasibility of developing a national neonatal hearing screening data collection, catalogue number PER 125, AIHW, Australian Government, accessed 4 July 2024.
Department of Health, Disability and Ageing (2025) National Framework for Newborn Hearing Screening, Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, Australian Government, accessed 4 August 2025.