QIM 8: Proportion of eligible regular clients with a record of the necessary risk factors in their GP record for CVD risk assessment
Assessment of absolute CVD risk based on multiple risk factors is more accurate than that based on individual risk factors due to the cumulative nature of risk effects. Absolute CVD risk assessment combines risk factors to calculate the probability that an individual will develop a cardiovascular event or other vascular disease within a specified time frame, usually 5 years (RACGP 2018). The risk assessment is useful for measuring risk in asymptomatic clients without established CVD (i.e. for primary prevention). Clients aged 45–74 years with established CVD and/or several other conditions who are already clinically determined to be at high risk of a cardiovascular event (NVDPA 2012) have been excluded from the measure as outlined in the PIPQI specification.
Capture of results recorded outside of the general practice setting
Results arising from clinical intervention conducted outside of the service that are known and recorded by the practice are included in the measure. However, sometimes test results recorded elsewhere may not be captured in this report. For example, this might be a result from a specialist service that is not recorded in the clinical information system of the client’s usual general practice due to an incompatible clinical information system between a practice and a specialist service.
Other sources of relevant information
There are other administrative data collections where the relevant data from these client-provider interactions are captured, for example, Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) and the National Health Survey (NHS) conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS).
This indicator reports on the proportion of regular clients aged 45 to 74 years without a CVD diagnosis with 4 risk factors (tobacco smoking status, diabetes type or HbA1c result or fasting glucose tests, blood pressure, lipid levels) recorded in their GP record to enable CVD risk assessment.
During this reporting period, the AIHW became aware of at least 2 different counting rules being applied by extraction tools in the enumeration of regular clients for this indicator.
The POLAR extraction tool used by 5 PHNs applied reference period cut-off dates of 24 months for recording systolic blood pressure and 5 years for recording cholesterol/HDL levels, in line with the RACGP Red Book (RACGP 2018).
In contrast, the CAT4 extraction tool used by 27 PHNs did not apply any reference period cut-off dates for diabetes screening, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol/HDL levels.
As shown in figures 42 to 44, these different methods lead to lower recording results with time restrictions applied, and a higher recording result with no time restrictions applied. These results should be interpreted with caution when comparing results between extraction tools.
QIM 8: Regional proportions
As of July 2022, nationally, 49.8% of regular clients aged 45 to 74 years without a CVD diagnosis had the necessary risk factors recorded in their GP record to enable CVD risk assessment. This varied from 34.2% to 71.3% across PHNs.