Asthma
Citation
AIHW
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2023) Asthma, AIHW, Australian Government, accessed 01 October 2023.
APA
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2023). Asthma. Retrieved from https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/chronic-respiratory-conditions/asthma
MLA
Asthma. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 30 June 2023, https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/chronic-respiratory-conditions/asthma
Vancouver
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Asthma [Internet]. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2023 [cited 2023 Oct. 1]. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/chronic-respiratory-conditions/asthma
Harvard
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) 2023, Asthma, viewed 1 October 2023, https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/chronic-respiratory-conditions/asthma
Get citations as an Endnote file: Endnote
Page highlights
- People with asthma experience episodes of wheezing, shortness of breath, coughing, chest tightness and fatigue due to widespread narrowing of the airways.
- Around 2.7 million Australians (11%) have asthma.
- 18% of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people had asthma (128,000 people) in 2018–19, with a higher rate among females (18%) compared with males (13%).
- Asthma accounted for 34% of the total burden of disease due to respiratory conditions and 2.5% of the total disease burden in 2022.
- Asthma was the leading cause of total burden in children aged 1–14 years. The rate of asthma burden was more than 40% higher for males aged 1–14 compared with females.
- Asthma cost the Australian health system an estimated $899.9 million, representing 19% of disease expenditure on respiratory conditions and 0.6% of total disease expenditure.
- There were 25,000 hospitalisations with a primary diagnosis of asthma in 2020–21 (100 per 100,000 population). The rate among children aged 0–14 (225) was markedly higher than people aged over 15 (68).
- During the last decade, the rate of hospitalisations where asthma was the principal diagnosis for children aged 0–14 decreased from 505 to 225 per 100,000 population.
- 78% of people with asthma had at least one other chronic condition in 2020–21.
- Arthritis, back problems, mental and behavioural conditions and COPD were more common in people with asthma compared with those without.
What is asthma?
Asthma is a common chronic condition that affects the airways (the breathing passage that carries air into our lungs). People with asthma experience episodes of wheezing, shortness of breath, coughing, chest tightness and fatigue due to widespread narrowing of the airways (NACA 2022).
The symptoms of asthma are usually reversible. The severity of asthma ranges from mild, intermittent symptoms, causing few problems for the individual, to severe and persistent wheezing and shortness of breath. In people with severe asthma, the disease can have a severe adverse impact on quality of life and may be life-threatening.
It is worth noting that it can be difficult to distinguish asthma from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) because the symptoms of both conditions can be similar—both have obstruction to the airways and both are chronic inflammatory diseases that involve the small airways (Cukic et al. 2012). Although the current definitions of asthma and COPD overlap, there are some important features that distinguish typical COPD from typical asthma. For more information, see Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
In addition, clinical symptoms of asthma and bronchiectasis may overlap significantly as symptoms of cough, sputum and dyspnoea can occur in either asthma or bronchiectasis (Kang et al. 2014). Although these two diseases present several common characteristics, they have different clinical outcomes and treatment approaches. Therefore, it is important to differentiate them at early stages of diagnosis, so appropriate management can be provided to achieve better quality of life (Athanazio 2012). Clinical guidelines for managing children with bronchiectasis have recently been updated (Chang et al. 2023).
Monitoring asthma in Australia: The National Asthma Strategy 2018
The National Asthma Strategy (the Strategy) outlines Australia’s national response to asthma and informs how existing limited health care resources can be better coordinated and targeted across all levels of government (NACA 2018). The Strategy also identifies the most effective and appropriate interventions to reduce the impact of asthma in the community.
The National Asthma Indicators
In terms of population-level monitoring, the Strategy includes a set of 10 national asthma indicators designed to provide valuable information for policymakers about the status of asthma in Australia. The National Asthma Indicators – an interactive overview was published in 2019. These indicators have been updated and are included throughout this report where relevant and are also published separately here.
It should be noted that data for recent years may be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the range of public health interventions that were put in place to help contain the spread of the virus that causes COVID-19 (for details see Australia’s Health 2022).
What causes asthma?
The fundamental causes of asthma are not completely understood. The strongest risk factors for developing asthma are a combination of genetic predisposition with environmental exposure to inhaled substances and particles that may provoke allergic reactions or irritate the airways. These are often termed asthma triggers and include examples such as:
- viral respiratory infections
- indoor allergens (for example, house dust mites in bedding, carpets, and stuffed furniture, pollution, and pet dander)
- outdoor allergens (such as pollens and moulds)
- tobacco smoke
- chemical irritants, including at the workplace
- air pollution
- strong odours, such as perfume.
Other triggers can include cold air, change in temperature, thunderstorms, extreme emotional arousal such as anger or fear, hormonal changes, pregnancy, and physical exercise. Certain medications can also trigger asthma: aspirin and other non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, and beta-blockers (used to treat high blood pressure, heart conditions and migraine) (WHO 2017).
Impact of natural events on asthma
Natural disasters or extreme weather changes can affect human health drastically, and events that affect air quality can have a direct impact on asthma. Two natural events that have affected asthma in recent times are thunderstorm asthma and the bushfires of 2019–20.
Thunderstorm asthma
Thunderstorm asthma can occur suddenly in spring or summer when there is a lot of pollen in the air and the weather is hot, dry, windy and stormy. People with asthma and/or hay fever need to be extra cautious to avoid flare-ups induced by thunderstorm asthma between September and January in Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland because it can be very serious (NACA 2019).
In 2016, a serious thunderstorm asthma epidemic was triggered in Melbourne when very high pollen counts coincided with adverse meteorological conditions, resulting in 3,365 people presenting at hospital emergency departments over 30 hours, and 10 deaths (Thien et al. 2018). Following this event, a thunderstorm asthma forecasting system has been developed to give Victorians early warning of possible epidemic thunderstorm asthma events in pollen season (Victoria State Government 2022). See Natural environment and health.
Australian bushfires of 2019–20
The bushfires that swept across Australia in 2019–20 resulted in 33 deaths, destruction of over 3,000 houses and millions of hectares of land (Parliament of Australia 2020). Bushfire smoke exposure was significantly associated with an increased risk of respiratory morbidity (Liu et al. 2015).
Nationally, hospitalisation rates increased for asthma and COPD coinciding with increased bushfire activity during the 2019–20 bushfire season (AIHW 2021c). For asthma, the highest increase was 36% in the week beginning 12 January 2020 (2.4 per 100,000 persons) compared with the previous 5-year average (1.7 per 100,000 persons).
For emergency department presentations for asthma, the highest increase of 44% was seen in the week beginning 12 January 2020 (4.7 per 100,000 persons compared with the previous bushfire season 3.3 per 100,000 persons). See Natural environment and health.
Risk factors associated with asthma
Asthma shares several modifiable risk factors with other chronic conditions, such as:
- tobacco use (smoking or exposure to cigarette smoke)
- exposure to environmental hazards (for example, exposure to air pollutants)
- overweight/obesity
- sedentary lifestyle.
Asthma can also be associated with having other conditions such as allergic rhinitis (Beasley et al. 2015).
Risk factors may increase the chance of developing asthma in the first place (either in childhood or as an adult) or may increase the chance that a person with asthma will develop additional health problems.
Risk factors vary according to the person's age, and according to the type of asthma that they have. Having a risk factor that is associated with asthma, or poor health outcomes related to asthma, does not necessarily mean that the risk factor caused these problems, or that they can be prevented.
In people with asthma, risk factors associated with an increased risk of flare-ups include:
- having frequent episodes of coughing, shortness of breath, and wheezing (e.g., more than 2 days/week)
- not taking preventer treatment regularly (medicines used every day in asthma control to minimise symptoms and reduce the likelihood of episodes or flare-ups. Inhaled corticosteroids are the most used preventers) (NACA 2022)
- frequent reliever inhaler use (medicines used for the rapid relief of asthma symptoms when they occur) (NACA 2022)
- comorbidities (e.g., mental illness, obesity, chronic rhino sinusitis)
- major socioeconomic problems
- exposure to smoking; allergens; air pollution (GINA 2019).
These risk factors may differ depending on the severity of asthma type a person has (McDonald et al. 2018).
Common risk factors
Based on the 2020–21 National Health Survey (NHS), people with asthma were more likely to be current daily smokers, insufficiently physically active and/or obese, compared with those without asthma (see Figure 1). Risk factor definitions are included in the Technical notes section of this report. These risk factors are also common among people with other chronic conditions.
Selected risk factors
Smoking status
Tobacco use or exposure to environmental tobacco smoke are risk factors associated with the development of asthma. For people who already have asthma, smoking or exposure to environmental tobacco smoke can increase the risk of flare-ups and need for emergency care for asthma (Polosa & Thomson 2013). In people with asthma, smoking is also associated with a reduced effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids (Roche et al. 2015).
And yet, in 2020–21, people with asthma were more likely to be current daily smokers (14%, compared with 10% for people without asthma), and less likely to have never smoked compared with people without asthma (58% and 63%, respectively).
For support to quit, speak to your GP or call the Quitline (13 7848).
Physical activity
Evidence suggests that sedentary behaviour (as measured by screentime engagement) is associated with asthma symptoms in children (Rota et al. 2017). The association between physical activity and asthma symptoms may be complicated by the fact that, in some people who already have asthma, physical activity may trigger asthma symptoms, particularly if their asthma is poorly controlled.
Physical activity is generally recommended for adults and children with asthma to help manage the disease and improve quality of life (NACA 2022). Further, greater levels of physical activity and participation in rehabilitation programs is associated with improved asthma outcomes (Freitas 2021).
Based on the 2020–21 NHS, people with asthma were slightly less likely than people without asthma to meet the 2014 physical activity guidelines (24% compared with 28% for people without asthma).
Body mass
Studies show there are associations between overweight and obesity, as measured by Body Mass Index (BMI), and asthma, especially in high income countries (Beasley et al. 2015). Additionally, people with asthma who are overweight or obese often experience complications in treatment. There is evidence of an association between being obese and developing asthma; however, the causative mechanisms between body mass and asthma are not currently well understood (Peters et al. 2018; Kim et al. 2014).
Based on the 2020–21 NHS, people with asthma were 1.8 times as likely to be obese (by self-reported body mass index or BMI—see Technical notes) as people without asthma (39% and 22% respectively). Note that self-reported data is likely to an underestimate.
The following dashboard can be used to explore the data in more detail.
Figure 1: Prevalence of selected risk factors in people aged 18 and over with and without asthma, 2020–21
This bar chart shows risk factors in adults with and without asthma in 2020–21. People aged 18 years and over with asthma were more likely to be current daily smokers (14% compared with 10% among people without asthma), more likely to be insufficiently physically active (according to the 2014 physical activity guidelines) (77% compared with 72% among people without asthma) and more likely to be obese (39% compared with 22% among people without asthma).
This bar chart the shows smoking status of adults with and without asthma in 2020–21. People aged 18 years and over with asthma were more likely to be current daily smokers (14% compared with 10% of people without asthma) and less likely to have never smoked (58% compared with 63% among people without asthma).
This bar chart shows physical activity of adults with and without asthma in 2020–21. People aged 18 years and over with asthma were more likely than people without asthma to be insufficiently physically active (according to the 2014 physical activity guidelines) (24% compared with 28% for people without asthma).
This bar chart shows self-reported Body Mass Index (BMI) of adults with and without asthma in 2020–21. People aged 18 and over with asthma were more likely to be obese (39% compared with 22% among people without asthma).

Age differences in risk factors in people with asthma
For people with asthma, the prevalence of risk factors varies by age. In 2020–21, people aged 18–44 and 45–64 with asthma were more likely to be a current daily smoker (14% and 16%, respectively) compared with those aged 65 and over (9.4%) (Figure 2). Smoke free laws, tobacco price increases, plain cigarette packaging and greater exposure to mass media campaigns may contribute to lower smoking rates among older Australians (Wakefield et al. 2014).
People with asthma aged 45–64 were more likely to be a current daily smoker, not to meet the 2014 physical activity guidelines and to be obese compared with those aged 18–44 and those aged 65 and over.
The following dashboard can be used to explore the data in more detail.
Figure 2: Prevalence of selected risk factors in people aged 18 and over with asthma, by age group, 2020–21
This bar chart shows selected risk factors among adults with asthma in 2020–21, by age group. Adults aged 18–44 and 45–64 with asthma were more likely to be a current daily smoker (14% and 16%, respectively) compared with people with asthma aged 65 and over (9.4%). People with asthma aged 45–64 were more likely to be insufficiently physically active (according to the 2014 physical activity guidelines) and to be obese compared with those aged 18–44 and those aged 65 and over.

How common is asthma?
National asthma indicator 1: The proportion of the Australian population who report having current and long-term asthma
Around 2.7 million Australians (11% of the population) have asthma, based on self‑reported data from the 2020–21 Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) National Health Survey (NHS) (ABS 2022a).
Box 1 Comparability of the ABS National Health Survey 2020–21
The ABS National Health Survey (NHS) 2020–21 was collected online during the COVID-19 pandemic and is a break in time series. Data should be used for point-in-time analysis only and cannot be compared with previous years. Thus, only 2020–21 is reported here.
For more information see National Health Survey: First Results methodology 2020–21.
Prevalence by age and sex
Based on the 2020–21 NHS, among those aged 0–14, asthma rates were similar for boys (9.3%) and girls (7.7%). Over the age of 15, asthma was more common among women for all age groups except those aged 25–34. Prevalence was the same (10%) for males and females for those aged 25–34 (Figure 3).
This change in prevalence for males and females in adulthood is likely due to a complex interaction between changing airway size and hormonal changes that occur during adolescent development, as well as differences in environmental exposures (Dharmage et al. 2019).
Prevalence in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people
In 2018–19, 18% of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (about 128,000) reported having asthma, with a higher rate among females (18%) compared with males (13%). Rates were similar to those reported in 2012–13 (19%) (ABS 2019).
The prevalence of asthma among Indigenous Australians was 1.6 times as high as non-Indigenous Australians (18% and 11%, respectively) after adjusting for differences in age structure (Figure 3). The difference in asthma prevalence between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians exists across all age groups but is more marked for older adults.
For more information and data on respiratory conditions in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, see the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework Measure 1.04 (1.04 Respiratory disease – AIHW Indigenous HPF).
The following dashboard can be used to explore the data in more detail.
Figure 3: Prevalence of asthma, by sex, age and Indigenous status
This bar chart shows the prevalence of asthma for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians in 2018–19. One in six (16%) of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people had asthma in 2018–19. The prevalence of asthma among Indigenous Australians was higher than among non-Indigenous Australians in all age groups but is more marked for older adults.
This bar chart shows the prevalence of asthma by age group and sex in 2020–21. For children aged 0–14 years, asthma was slightly more common in boys (9%) than in girls (8%). Over the age of 15, asthma was more common among women for all age groups except those aged 25–34. The prevalence of asthma is highest in females aged 75 and over.

Variation between population groups
Based on the 2020–21 NHS, people born in Australia were more than twice as likely as those born overseas to have asthma (13% compared with 6%) (ABS 2022a).
Those who live in Inner regional areas were more likely than those who live in Outer Regional and Remote areas to have asthma (13% compared with 9%) (ABS 2022a).
People with a profound or severe core activity limitation were almost 3 times more likely than those with no disability to have asthma (23% compared with 8%) (ABS 2022a).
Additional data on asthma prevalence by country of birth and other culturally and linguistically diverse measures are also reported using the ABS 2021 Census in Chronic health conditions among culturally and linguistically diverse Australians, 2021 (AIHW 2021b).
Impact of asthma
Asthma has varying degrees of impact on the physical, psychological, and social wellbeing of people living with the condition, depending on disease severity and the level of control. People with asthma are more likely to report poor quality of life, especially those with severe or poorly controlled asthma (ACAM 2011).
Burden of disease
In 2022, asthma accounted for 2.5% of total disease burden (DALY); 4.5% of non-fatal burden (YLD), and 0.3% of fatal burden (YLL). Within the respiratory disease group, asthma accounted for 34% of total burden (DALY); 52% of non-fatal burden (YLD); and 5.4% of fatal burden (YLL).
What is burden of disease?
Burden of disease analysis is a way of measuring the impact of diseases and injuries on a population. It is the difference between a population’s actual health and its ideal health, where ideal health is living to old age in good health (without disease or disability). It combines health loss from living with illness and injury (non-fatal burden, or years lived with disability, or YLD) and dying prematurely (fatal burden, or years of life lost, or YLL) to estimate total health loss (total burden, or disability-adjusted life years, or DALY). One DALY is one year of 'healthy life' lost due to illness and/or death (AIHW 2022b).
Variation by age and sex
- Overall, the total burden from asthma for females was 1.2 times as high as for males (5.6 vs 4.9 DALY per 1,000 population).
- Asthma was the leading cause of burden for people aged 1–4, 5–9, and 10–14 years (11.1%, 14.5%, and 12.0% of total burden (DALY), respectively).
- Young males (aged under 20) had a substantially higher rate of asthma burden (DALY) than young females. This difference was especially pronounced for those aged 1–14, where the male rate was more than 40% higher than the female rate.
The following dashboard can be used to explore the indicator data in more detail.
Figure 4: Burden of disease due to asthma, by sex, age and year
This bar chart shows the burden of disease measures of total burden (disability-adjusted life years, or DALY), non-fatal burden (years lived with disability, or YLD) and fatal burden (years of life lost, or YLL) due to asthma by age groups and by sex in selected years from 2003 to 2022. The rate of asthma burden increased from 4.9 to 5.3 DALY per 1,000 population between 2003 and 2022 or 0.4% per year on average, after adjusting for changes in age structure. This increase was driven by non-fatal burden (YLD).
In 2022, the total burden from asthma for females was 1.2 times as high as for males (5.8 vs 4.9 DALY per 1,000 population). Asthma was the leading cause of burden for people aged 1–14 years. Young males (aged under 20) had a substantially higher rate of asthma burden (DALY) than young females. This difference was especially pronounced for those aged 1–14, where the male rate was more than 40% higher than the female rate.

Trends over time
The rate of asthma burden increased from 4.9 to 5.3 DALY per 1,000 population between 2003 and 2022 or 0.4% per year on average, after adjusting for changes in age structure. This increase was driven by non-fatal burden (YLD).
Further detail is available in the Australian Burden of Disease Study 2022.
Variation between population groups
In 2018, after adjusting for age, rates of asthma burden (DALY, YLL and YLD) increased with increasing remoteness and levels of disadvantage:
- Remote and very remote areas were 1.5 times as high as Major cities (7.3 and 5.0 DALY per 1,000 population, respectively).
- Fatal burden (YLL) had the greatest contrast between socioeconomic group. The lowest socioeconomic group (living in the areas with the highest level of disadvantage) had around 6 times the rate of fatal burden for asthma than the highest group (living in areas with the lowest level of disadvantage) (AIHW 2021a).
Further detail is available in the Australian Burden of Disease Study 2018: Interactive data on disease burden.
The following dashboard can be used to explore the indicator data in more detail.
Figure 5: Burden of disease due to asthma, by sex, remoteness area, socioeconomic group and year
This data visualisation includes 2 charts, the first presents DALY, YLD and YLL due to asthma by remoteness for the years 2011 to 2018. In 2018, the DALY due to asthma was highest in Remote and very remote areas, and the DALY due to asthma in Major cities, Inner regional and Outer regional areas were similar.
The second chart presents DALY, YLD and YLL due to asthma by socioeconomic group and year from 2011 to 2018. In 2018, DALY was highest in the lowest socioeconomic group (living in the areas with the highest level of disadvantage), and lowest in the highest socioeconomic group (living in areas with the lowest level of disadvantage).

Health system expenditure
Understanding the contribution of asthma to direct health care expenditure helps to explain the economic impact of the disease. Furthermore, knowledge of the relative contribution of the various health care sectors (hospital, out-of-hospital medical care, and pharmaceutical) to overall asthma-related expenditure assists in planning interventions to optimise this expenditure.
It should also be acknowledged that financial costs represent a small part of the overall economic impact caused by asthma. A report on the estimated economic cost of asthma in Australia was published in 2015 and data included in the 2018 National Asthma Strategy (Deloitte 2015; NACA 2018).
In 2019–20, an estimated $899.9 million of expenditure in the Australian health system was for asthma, representing 0.6% of total health expenditure and 19% of expenditure of all respiratory conditions (AIHW 2022c).
Where is the money spent?
Figure 6 presents a detailed breakdown of estimated expenditure for asthma by area of the health system, showing that:
- Primary care represented 71% ($639.1 million) of asthma expenditure, which was around 2.5 times the primary care portion of total health expenditure (28%). The Pharmaceutical benefits scheme proportion of asthma expenditure was especially large in comparison to the average, more than 4 times the proportion for total health expenditure (51% compared with 12%).
- Hospital services accounted for 24% ($219.1 million) of asthma spending, which was around 2.6 times lower when compared with the proportion of total health expenditure for hospital services (63%). The public hospital emergency department proportion of asthma expenditure was especially large in comparison to the average, 1.6 times the proportion for total health expenditure (7.5% compared with 4.7%).
- Referred medical services represented 4.6% ($41.6 million) of asthma expenditure, which was less than the proportion of total health expenditure for referred medical services (9.1%).
The following dashboard can be used to explore the data in more detail.
Figure 6: Amount and proportion (%) of asthma expenditure attributed to each area of the health system, compared to expenditure for all disease groups, 2019–20
This icicle chart shows the health expenditure on asthma compared to total health expenditure by area of expenditure, in 2019–20. In 2019–20 an estimated $899.9 million of expenditure in the Australian health system was for asthma, representing 0.6% of total health expenditure and 19% of expenditure of all respiratory conditions. This included $639.1 million for primary care, $219.1 million for hospital services, and $41.6 million for referred medical services.

Figure 7 presents the component (%) that asthma expenditure makes up for each area of the health system, showing that in 2019–20, asthma accounted for:
- 2.6% ($455.0 million) of all Pharmaceutical benefits scheme expenditure – ranking 9th of all diseases/conditions.
- 0.2% ($84.1 million) of all public hospital admitted patient expenditure.
The following dashboard can be used to explore the indicator data in more detail.
Figure 7: Proportion of expenditure attributed to asthma, for each area of the health system, 2019–20
This bar chart shows the proportion of area expenditure for asthma by sex for 2019–20. Asthma accounted for 2.6% ($455.0 million) of all Pharmaceutical benefits scheme expenditure – ranking 9th of all diseases/conditions and 0.2% ($84.1 million) of all public hospital admitted patient expenditure.

Who is the money spent on?
In 2019–20:
- The age distribution of spending on asthma reflects the prevalence distribution, with the majority being spent on older age groups (52% for people aged 45 and over).
- More asthma expenditure was attributed to females than males ($494.9 million and $354.1 million, respectively), with the remainder $50.9 million (5.7%) not specified.
Further detail is available in Disease expenditure in Australia 2019–20.
In 2018–19, it was estimated that:
- Asthma expenditure per case was 1.1 times greater for females than males ($290 and $265 per case, respectively).
- Asthma expenditure per case was 44% lower than respiratory conditions as a group ($285 and $515 per case, respectively) (AIHW 2022d).
Further detail is available in Health system spending per case of disease and for certain risk factors.
Investment in asthma research
Between 2000 and 2022, the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) has expended $348 million towards research relevant to asthma.
Since its inception in 2015 and 31 March 2023, the Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) has invested $283.8 million in 151 grants with a focus on respiratory health research. Of these, 8 grants ($11.3 million) focus on asthma research. Examples include:
- $2.4 million to the University of Newcastle for the project titled, A comprehensive digital solution to empower asthma and comorbidity self-management; and
- $1.6 million to the Queensland University of Technology for the project titled, Oral bacterial lysate to prevent persistent wheeze in infants after severe bronchiolitis; a randomised placebo-controlled trial (BLIPA; Bacterial Lysate in Preventing Asthma).
How does asthma affect quality of life?
National asthma indicator 3: Impact of asthma on quality of life
3a: The proportion of people aged 18 and over with and without asthma who rated their health status as excellent or very good.
3b: The proportion of people aged 18 and over with and without asthma who experienced high or very high levels of psychological distress.
3c: The proportion of people aged 18 and over who reported that asthma interfered with daily activities 2 or more times in the last 4 weeks.
In 2020–21, self-assessed health status among people with asthma aged 18 and over was, on average, worse than among those without asthma. People with asthma were less likely to describe themselves as having excellent health compared with people without asthma (11% and 21%, respectively), and more likely to describe themselves as having fair health compared with people without asthma (17% and 10%, respectively) (Figure 8). Conversely, people with asthma were more likely to describe themselves as having poor health compared with people without asthma (5.4% and 2.6%, respectively).
During the same period, people with asthma were more likely to experience high and very high levels of psychological distress (19% and 11%, respectively) compared with those without asthma (12% and 6.8%, respectively) (Figure 8).
Just over a fifth of people with asthma (21%) reported that asthma interfered with their daily activities 2 or more times in the past 4 weeks. Eight per cent of people reported interference once (daily activities included going to school, playing with friends, going to work, exercising, and getting around places) (Figure 8).
The following dashboard can be used to explore the data in more detail.
Figure 8: Quality of life measures (age standardised) for people aged 18 and over with and without asthma, 2020–21
This bar chart shows the self-assessed health status among people aged 18 years and over with and without asthma in 2020–21. People with asthma were less likely to describe themselves as having excellent health compared with people without asthma (11% and 22%, respectively), and more likely to describe themselves as having fair health compared with people without asthma (17% and 10%, respectively). Conversely, people with asthma were more likely to describe themselves as having poor health compared with people without asthma (5.4% and 2.6%, respectively).
This bar chart shows psychological distress experienced by people aged 18 and over with and without asthma in 2020–21. People with asthma were more likely to experience high and very high levels of psychological distress (19% and 11%, respectively) compared with those without asthma (12% and 6.8%, respectively).
This bar chart shows the number of times asthma interfered with daily activities in the last 4 weeks in 2020–21. Just over a fifth of people with asthma (21%) reported that asthma interfered with their daily activities 2 or more times in the past 4 weeks. Eight per cent of people reported interference once.

Deaths
How many deaths were associated with asthma?
Asthma was recorded as an underlying cause of death for 351 deaths or 1.4 deaths per 100,000 population in Australia in 2021, representing 0.2% of all deaths and 2.6% of all respiratory deaths.
Asthma was recorded as an associated cause of death for an additional 1,641 deaths equalling a total of 1,992 deaths in Australian due to or associated with asthma. This represented 1.2% of all deaths and 4.3% of respiratory deaths.
National asthma indicator 4: Deaths due to asthma
4a: The number of deaths (all ages) due to asthma per 100,000 population (age-standardised).
4b: The number of deaths (for 5–34, 35–55, 55+years) due to asthma, per 100,000 population (age-standardised).
Variation by age and sex
In 2021, asthma mortality (as the underlying cause of death) was:
- more common in older people (63% aged 75 and over), which is slightly less than the proportion of people aged 75 and over for total deaths (67%).
- higher for females (70% of asthma deaths were female compared with 48% of total deaths).
- similar by age and sex for asthma as the underlying cause of death and any cause of death.
The following dashboard can be used to explore the data in more detail.
Figure 9: Age profile of asthma mortality statistics, by sex
This line chart shows death rate due to asthma by sex and age in 2021, for asthma as the underlying condition, an associated-only cause of conditions and any cause of condition. In 2021, asthma mortality (as the underlying cause of death) was more common in older people (63% aged 75 and over), which is slightly less than the proportion of people aged 75 and over for total deaths (67%). Asthma mortality was higher for females (70% of asthma deaths were female compared with 48% of total deaths) and it was similar by age and sex for asthma as the underlying cause of death and any cause of death.

Trends over time
Age standardised mortality rates for asthma (as the underlying cause of death) between 2011 and 2021:
- have slightly decreased with some minor fluctuation between 1.5 and 1.1 per 100,000 population. This trend is reversed when looking at asthma as any cause of death where the rate increased from 5.1 to 6.0 per 100,000 population.
- show that females have had a consistently higher mortality rate than males across all years and this pattern remains true for asthma as an underlying or associated cause of death.
The following dashboard can be used to explore the data in more detail.
Figure 10: Historical asthma mortality statistics, by sex, 2011–2021
This line chart shows the death rate for asthma as the underlying condition, the associated-only cause of conditions and any cause of condition from 2011 to 2021. Between 2011 and 2021 age standardised mortality rate for asthma have slightly decreased with some minor fluctuation between 1.5 and 1.1 per 100,000 population. During the same period, females have had a consistently higher mortality rate than males.

Variation between population groups
Remote and very remote areas had less than 20 deaths due to asthma in 2021. Major cities had the least asthma deaths per population compared with Inner regional and Outer regional areas (1.3 and 1.5 times more than Major cities, respectively). There was no difference between remoteness areas when asthma was an associated cause of death only.
The lowest socioeconomic group (living in the areas with the highest level of disadvantage) had 2.3 times more asthma deaths per population than the highest socioeconomic group (living in areas with the lowest level of disadvantage) in 2021 (1.4 vs 0.6 underlying causes of death per 100,000 population, age standardised). The same pattern was seen regardless of whether asthma was recorded as an underlying or associated cause of death.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people experience higher asthma mortality rates than non-Indigenous Australians:
- In the 5-year period from 2015–2019, 74 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people died from asthma, with a mortality rate of 2.1 per 100,000 population (based on 5 jurisdictions with adequate Indigenous identification (NSW, Qld, WA, SA and NT) (AIHW 2023).
- After adjusting for differences in age structure, the mortality rate of asthma among Indigenous Australians was 2.5 times as high as non-Indigenous Australians (3.7 compared with 1.5 per 100,000 population).
The asthma mortality rate differences between these population subgroups may be due to differences in smoking rates, access to health services, or other social and environmental factors. In Australia, smoking prevalance is higher among people living in more remote areas, among people living in areas of higher disadvantage, and among Indigenous Australians (AIHW 2018).
Further detail on mortality data is available in the Chronic respiratory condition mortality data tables 2023.
Treatment and management of asthma
In general, symptoms of asthma are easily controlled in most people by making lifestyle changes and using medications, so they can have normal lives. The main aims of asthma treatments are:
- to stop asthma from interfering with school, work, or play
- to prevent flare-ups or ‘attacks’
- to keep symptoms under control
- to keep lungs as healthy as possible (NACA 2022).
What medicines are used to treat asthma?
There are several medicines available to treat asthma. Different asthma medicines are used to achieve different goals, as follows:
- Relievers are medicines used for the rapid relief of asthma symptoms when they occur. They can also be used before exercise to prevent exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (constriction of the airways). Short-acting beta agonist medications (SABA) are the most used relievers (NACA 2022).
- Preventers are medicines used every day in asthma control to minimise symptoms and reduce the likelihood of episodes or flare-ups. Inhaled corticosteroids are the most used preventers.
- Other medicines such as long-acting bronchodilators and biologics are used for management of difficult-to-treat asthma or as add-on options for management of severe asthma flare-ups.
Treatment guidelines for asthma for people aged 12 and older changed in 2020 i.e. the suggested prescription is now a single inhaler with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), specifically budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort) used as both a preventer and reliever (Reddel 2020)
A relatively new class of medications known as biologics are also being increasingly prescribed to those with severe asthma. Biologics act like preventers but are not classified as such. They can only be prescribed by a respiratory specialist and some are not yet covered by the Pharmaceutical benefits scheme (PBS). Therefore, not all biologics are included in reporting on medications in this section.
A key focus of the National Asthma Strategy is to improve outcomes for those with severe or poorly controlled asthma (NACA 2018). Asthma is described as well-controlled when there are few symptoms and little reliever use (e.g., less than 2 days/week), and no night waking or limitation of activity. ‘Well-controlled asthma’ may indicate mild disease and/or good management, whereas ‘poorly-controlled asthma’ may indicate severe disease or poor management.
Assessing the overall level of asthma control in the population can provide insight into the effectiveness of the management of asthma in the community and the need for further efforts in improving asthma management.
Frequent use of relievers is an indicator of poor asthma control, with dispensing frequency used as a proxy for reliever use:
- 3 or more reliever prescriptions per year indicating poor asthma control
- 6 or more indicating very poor control
- 12 or more indicating extremely poor asthma control (ACAM 2011).
In line with guidance from the AIHW’s National Asthma and Other Chronic Respiratory Conditions Monitoring Advisory Group, the dispensing of reliever medicines 3 or more times in 12 months has been selected as the threshold for poor asthma control.
National asthma indicator 5: The proportion of people, aged 40 and under, dispensed at least one reliever, who were dispensed relievers 3 or more times, within 12 months
Analysis of 2021–22 Pharmaceutical benefits scheme (PBS) data shows that, of all people aged 40 and under who were dispensed at least one reliever, 18% were dispensed relievers 3 or more times within 12 months (Figure 11).
Variation by age and sex
- The rate of dispensing relievers 3 or more times in 12 months was the same (18%) for men and women for all ages (0–40) however increased with age.
- Twenty-six per cent of people aged 35–40 dispensed at least one reliever were dispensed relievers 3 or more times in 12 months – higher than for all other age groups.
Trends over time
Rates have changed little since 2017–18 but for all age groups apart from 0–14, a spike can be seen in 2020–21 (Figure 8). The corresponding spike for those aged 0–14 is observed earlier, in 2019–20. This same trend is noted for preventer medications (Indicator 6) and may be related to anecdotal evidence that many people started to panic buy respiratory medication in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic where they had an existing condition. Bushfires in 2019–20 may also have contributed to this increase in dispensing of asthma medication.
From the end of March 2020 pharmacists were strongly encouraged to limit dispensing and sales of all therapeutic goods (especially salbutamol inhalers) generally to a one-month supply or one unit in response to the stockpiling occurring (DoHAC:TGA 2020). In October 2020, changes in legislation were enacted to limit dispensing of some asthma medication (mainly salbutamol) to a maximum of one pack per person (PSA 2022).
The following dashboard can be used to explore the data in more detail.
Figure 11: Proportion of people aged 40 and under dispensed at least one reliever, who were dispensed relievers 3 or more times within 12 months, by sex and age, 2017–18 to 2021–22
This bar chart shows the proportion of people (aged 40 and under) dispensed SABA relievers 3 or more times among those who were dispensed at least one SABA within 12 months in 2021–22 by age. Of all people aged 40 and under who were dispensed at least one inhaled SABA reliever, 18% were dispensed SABA 3 or more times within the 12 months.
This bar chart shows the proportion of people (aged 40 and under) dispensed SABA relievers 3 or more times among those who were dispensed at least one SABA within 12 months by sex and age in 2021–22. The rate of dispensing SABA relievers 3 or more times was higher for males than females for all age groups and increased with age for males and females.
This line chart shows the proportion of people who were dispensed preventer medicines 3 or more times over time. From 2017–18 to 2021–22, rates of dispensing have changed little, but for all age groups apart from 0–14, a slight increase can be seen in 2020–21.

Preventer medicine is the mainstay of asthma management, to minimise symptoms and exacerbations. National guidelines for the management of asthma recommend preventers to be taken regularly (either daily or twice daily) rather than intermittently (NACA 2022).
In line with advice from the AIHW’s National Asthma and Other Chronic Respiratory Conditions Monitoring Advisory Group, the dispensing of these medicines 3 or more times in 12 months has been selected as the threshold for reflecting better management of moderate to severe asthma.
National asthma indicator 6: The proportion of people, aged 50 and under, dispensed at least one preventer medicine, who were dispensed preventer medicines 3 or more times, within 12 months
Analysis of 2021–22 Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) data shows that, of people aged 50 and under who were dispensed at least one preventer medicine, 33% were dispensed preventer medicines 3 or more times within 12 months.
Variation by age and sex
- The rate of dispensing preventers 3 or more times in 12 months was slightly higher for males than females (35% and 31%, respectively).
- Males dispensed at least one preventer had higher rates of being dispensed preventers 3 or more times in 12 months compared with females irrespective of age (Figure 12).
- Children aged 0–14 were dispensed preventers at a similar rate to people aged 25–34 (29% and 30%).
- Slightly fewer people aged 15–24 (25%) were dispensed preventers 3 or more times in 12 months, the lowest rate for all people aged 50 and under.
- The rate of dispensing preventers 3 or more times in 12 months increased with age from 25% for those aged 15–24, up to 41% for those aged 45–50.
Trends over time
Rates have changed little since 2017–18 but for all age groups apart from 0–14, a spike can be seen in 2020–21 (Figure 9). The corresponding spike for those aged 0–14 is observed earlier, in 2019–20. This same trend is noted for asthma control medications (Indicator 5), and as covered in detail in that section, may be due to stockpiling of medication during the COVID-19 pandemic and a subsequent restriction in dispensing of some medications to combat this. Bushfires in 2019–20 may also have contributed to this increase in dispensing of asthma medication.
Further information on the specific preventer medication that this indicator covers is provided in the Technical specifications for this report.
For more detailed information about medicines used to treat asthma and the national guidelines for asthma management, refer to Australian Asthma Handbook, Version 2.2.
The following dashboard can be used to explore the data in more detail.
Figure 12: Proportion of people aged 50 and under dispensed at least one preventer medicine, who were dispensed preventer medicines 3 or more times within 12 months, by sex and age, 2017–18 to 2021–22
This bar chart shows the proportion of people (aged 50 and under) dispensed preventer medicines 3 or more times among those who were dispensed at least one preventer within 12 months by age in 2021–22. Children aged 0–14 were dispensed preventers at a similar rate to people aged 25–34. Slightly fewer people aged 15–24 (25%) were dispensed preventers 3 or more times in 12 months, the lowest rate for all people aged 50 and under. The rate of dispensing preventers 3 or more times increased with age from 25% for those aged 15–24 to 41% for those aged 45–50.
This bar chart shows the proportion of people (aged 50 and under) dispensed preventer medicines 3 or more times among those who were dispensed at least one preventer within 12 months by sex and age in 2021–22. The rate of dispensing preventers 3 or more times in 12 months was slightly higher for males than females (35% and 31%, respectively). Males dispensed at least one preventer had higher rates of being dispensed preventers 3 or more times in 12 months compared with females irrespective of age.
This line chart shows the proportion of people (aged 50 and under) who were dispensed preventer medicines 3 or more times over time. From 2017–18 to 2021–22, rates of dispensing have changed little, but for all age groups apart from 0–14, a slight increase can be seen in 2020–21. The corresponding increase for those aged 0–14 is observed earlier, in 2019–20.

Management of asthma
Since asthma is a chronic disease, it requires management all the time, not just when symptoms are present. The four parts of managing asthma are:
- identify and minimise exposure to asthma triggers
- understand and use medications as prescribed to have good asthma control
- monitor asthma to recognise signs when it is getting worse
- know what to do when asthma gets worse (Stanford Children’s Health 2020).
For more detailed information about management of asthma, refer to the Australian Asthma Handbook, Version 2.2: Management for children, adolescents, and adults.
What role do GPs play in managing asthma?
General practitioners (GPs) play an important role in the management of asthma in the community. This role includes assessment, diagnosis, prescription of regular medications, education, provision of written action plans, and regular review as well as managing asthma flare-ups. Asthma-related visits to GPs may occur for a variety of reasons, including:
- the acute or reactive management of asthma symptoms
- a review during or following a flare-up
- a review or initiation of a written action plan
- a visit for maintenance activities, such as monitoring and prescription of regular medications
- review asthma with other possible comorbidities
- referral to a specialist and other health professionals.
Until 2017, the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health (BEACH) survey was the most detailed source of data about general practice activity in Australia (Britt et al. 2016). In the decade up to 2015–16, according to this survey:
- asthma was one of the most frequently managed chronic problems
- the estimated rate of asthma management in general practice declined from 2.3 in 100 encounters to 2.0 in 100 encounters.
It is worth noting that there is currently no nationally consistent primary health care data collection to monitor provision of care by GPs. See General practice, allied health and other primary care services.
Asthma cycle of care
Asthma cycle of care claims are used as a proxy for GP care for asthma since no other data source is available. It involves at least 2 asthma-related consultations with a GP within 12 months for a patient with moderate-to-severe asthma. There are 12 MBS items for GP consultations that relate to the completion of an asthma cycle of care.
Asthma cycle of care data has been included for this update but it should noted that these items were removed from the Medicare Benefits Scheme as of 1 November 2022 and thus will not be used for reporting on GP encounters for asthma in future (RACGP 2022).
Data development work is being progressed to identify a suitable alternative to this data.
Limitations of the asthma cycle of care data include that:
- patients may also use other forms of health care to manage their asthma, which are not covered by this cycle of care measure.
- the denominator for this indicator includes all people in Australia not just those diagnosed with asthma.
National asthma indicator 7: The proportion of people who claimed the completion of the asthma cycle of care service
Analysis of Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) data shows that 0.1% of the population (around 13,000 people) claimed the completion of the asthma cycle of care in 2021–22, with little difference observed by sex after adjusting for age structure (Figure 13).
From 2017–18 to 2021–22, the proportion of people claiming the asthma cycle of care decreased from 0.3% to 0.1%. This decrease was noted for all age groups and was slightly greater for females than males (0.3% to 0.1% and 0.2% to 0.1%, respectively).
The following dashboard can be used to explore the data in more detail.
Figure 13: Proportion of people who claimed the completion of the asthma cycle of care service, by age and sex, 2017–18 to 2021–22
This bar chart shows the proportion of people with asthma who claimed completion of the asthma cycle of care service by age group in 2021–22. In 2021–22, less than 0.1% of the population claimed the completion of asthma cycle of care service. The proportion of the population claiming the service was greatest in children aged 0–14, and lowest in people aged 15–44.
This bar chart shows the proportion of people with asthma who claimed the asthma cycle of care service by sex and age group in 2021–22.. Apart from boys aged 0–14, females claimed completion of the asthma cycle of care at higher rates than males.
This line chart shows the proportion of people with asthma who claimed the asthma cycle of care service over time. From 2017–18 to 2021–22, the proportion of people claiming the asthma cycle of care decreased from 0.27% to 0.05%. The decrease was noted across all age groups and was slightly greater for females than males (0.29% to 0.05% and 0.24% to 0.05%, respectively.

Asthma action plans
An asthma action plan is a written self-management plan which is prepared for patients with asthma by a health care professional to help them manage their condition and reduce the severity of acute asthma flare-ups. A patient’s individualised plan is developed to deal with their personal triggers, signs and symptoms, and medication.
Asthma action plans have formed part of the National Asthma Council Australia's guidelines for the management of asthma for over 30 years (NAC 1990) and have been promoted in public education campaigns on the basis that individualised written action plans improve asthma health outcomes (NACA 2022).
National asthma indicator 8: The proportion of people with asthma who have a written asthma action plan
According to the 2020–21 NHS, an estimated 34% of people with self-reported asthma across all ages had a written asthma action plan.
Variation by age and sex
- over two-thirds (69%) of children under 14 years of age had a written action plan, while less than one quarter (23%) of people aged 75 and over had a written action plan (ABS 2022a).
- Across all ages, females were more likely than males to have a written asthma action plan.
It is likely that these differences by age are due to schools and child care facilities requiring that children with asthma have a health care provider issued asthma action plan (Asthma Australia 2022).
Variation between population groups
Thirty-two per cent of Indigenous Australians had a written asthma action plan in 2018–19, with those living in Non-remote areas more likely to have a plan compared with those living in Remote areas (32% compared with 27%) (Figure 14).
The following dashboard can be used to explore the data in more detail.
Figure 14: Proportion of people with asthma who have a written asthma action plan by age, by age and sex, and for Indigenous Australians by remoteness area, 2020–21
This bar chart shows the proportion of people with asthma who had a written asthma action plan by age group in 2020–21. Children aged 0–14 (69%) were most likely to have a plan and those aged 25–34 were the least likely to have a plan (20%).
This bar chart shows the proportion of people with asthma who had a written asthma action plan by age and sex in 2020–21. Proportions were similar for boys and girls aged 0–14, and females were more likely to have a plan than males.
This bar chart shows the proportion of Indigenous Australians with asthma who had a written asthma action plan by remoteness in 2018–19. Indigenous Asutralians living in non-remote areas were more likely than those living in remote areas to have a plan (32% compared with 27%).

What role do hospitals play in treating asthma?
People with asthma require admission to hospital when flare ups or ‘attacks’ are potentially life-threatening or when they cannot be managed at home or by a GP.
National asthma indicator 9: The number of hospital admissions where asthma was the principal diagnosis, per 100,000 population (age-standardised)
Data from the AIHW National Hospital Morbidity Database (NHMD) show that in 2020–21, there were 25,000 hospitalisations where asthma was the principal diagnosis. The age-standardised rate of hospitalisations for asthma was 100 per 100,000 population.
Variation by age and sex
- The rate among children aged 0–14 (225 per 100,000 population) was markedly higher than the rate among people aged 15 and over (68 per 100,000 population) (Figure 15).
- In 2020–21, boys aged 0–14 were 1.6 times as likely as girls of the same age to be admitted to hospital for asthma.
- Conversely, of those aged 15 and over, females were 2.3 times as likely as males to be admitted to hospital for asthma.
These differences in hospitalisation by sex and age reflect in part the difference in the prevalence of asthma—which tends to be more common in boys than girls for those aged under 15, and generally more common in females than in males for those aged over 25.
Trends over time
During the last decade:
- the rate of hospitalisations where asthma was the principal diagnosis for children aged 0–14 decreased overall, falling from 505 per 100,000 population in 2010–11 to 225 per 100,000 population in 2020–21
- the proportion of children hospitalised overnight decreased from 79 to 64% with an average length of overnight stays of 1.5 days in 2020–21
- the rate of hospitalisations for asthma for those aged 15 and over fluctuated between 92 per 100,000 in 2010–11 and 68 per 100,000 population in 2020–21, peaking at 115 separations per 100,000 in 2016–17
- the proportion of overnight stays also decreased from 78 to 64%, with overnight stays averaging 2.4 bed days in 2020–21 (Figure 15).
The rate of hospitalisations over the past few years have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, for more information on this, see the Chronic respiratory conditions COVID-19 impact section.
The following dashboard can be used to explore the data in more detail.
Figure 15: Age profile of asthma hospitalisation statistics, by sex
This line chart shows hospitalisation rates for asthma by age and sex in 2020–21. Rates for males are higher than females below the age of 14. For those aged 15 and over hospitalisations rates are higher for females than males.

Age profile of hospitalisations for asthma compared with hospitalisations for all causes
While most hospitalisations for all causes in 2020–21 were for older people, 43% of the 25,000 hospitalisations for a primary diagnosis of asthma in Australia were for children aged 0–14 (Figure 16). The age profile of hospitalisations for asthma was much younger compared with hospitalisations for all causes in the same year.
The following dashboard can be used to explore the data in more detail.
Figure 16: Historical asthma hospitalisation statistics, by sex, 2011–2021
This line chart shows hospitalisation rates (per 100,000 population) for asthma by age and sex from 2010–11 to 2020–21. During the last decade, hospitalisations for asthma for both children (0–14 years) and adults have decreased with rates for females higher than males.

Seasonal variation in hospitalisations for asthma
Among children, the peaks for asthma hospitalisations occur in late summer (February) and autumn (May) (Figure 17). The peak in February is likely related to respiratory infections associated with returns to school and childcare after the summer break. Similar peaks are observed in September in Northern Hemisphere countries; lower use of preventer medication during holidays may also contribute.
Among adults, hospitalisations for asthma are highest in winter and early spring (June through to September), particularly in people aged 65 years and older (Figure 17). This coincides with the annual winter ‘flu’ season and may reflect the rise in respiratory infections observed then.
2020 was an exception to this general trend, and there was a large dip in hospitalisations in April and May for all age groups. This is likely due to lockdown mandates across the nation related to COVID-19. For more on the impact of COVID-19 see the Chronic respiratory conditions COVID-19 impact section.
Asthma hospitalisations can also be impacted by one-off natural events which occur on a seasonal basis, such as thunderstorms and bushfires (See section on ‘Impact of natural events on asthma’ in ‘What causes asthma section’ for more details).
The following dashboard can be used to explore the data in more detail.
Figure 17: Monthly variation in hospitalisations due to asthma, by age group, 2020
This line graph shows the hospitalisation rates (per 100,000 population) for asthma by age across the months of the year. Among children (0–14 years), the peaks for asthma hospitalisations occur in late summer (February) and autumn (May). Among adults (aged 15 and over), hospitalisations for asthma are highest in winter and early spring (June through to September).

Hospitalisations by Primary Health Care Network
In 2020–21, the 3 PHN areas with the highest (age-standardised) rates of hospitalisations were: Western Queensland (QLD), Northern Territory (NT), and Darling Downs and West Moreton (QLD) (245, 200 and 170 per 100,000 population, respectively) (Figure 18).
The 3 PHN areas with the lowest hospitalisation rates were: Perth North (WA), Perth South (WA), and South Eastern NSW (NSW) (54, 54, and 59 per 100,000 population, respectively).
The following dashboard can be used to explore the data in more detail.
Figure 18: Hospitalisations for asthma per 100,000 population by Primary Health Network areas, age standardised rate, 2020–21
This map shows hospitalisations for asthma by Primary Health Network (PHN) areas in 2020–21. The 3 PHN areas with the highest rates of hospitalisations were: Western Queensland (QLD), Northern Territory (NT), and Darling Downs and West Moreton (QLD). The 3 PHN areas with the lowest hospitalisation rates were: Perth North (WA), Perth South (WA), and South Eastern NSW (NSW).
Emergency department presentations for asthma
National asthma indicator 10: The number of emergency department presentations where asthma was the principal diagnosis, per 100,000 population (age-standardised)
Data from the National Non-Admitted Patient Emergency Department Care Database (NAPEDC) show that in 2020–21, there were 56,600 emergency department (ED) presentations for asthma, about 230 presentations per 100,000 population.
Variation by age and sex
- In 2020–21, rates were higher for females than males overall (245 compared with 215 per 100,000 population).
- However, boys aged 0–14 were 1.6 times as likely as girls of the same age to present to the emergency department for asthma (Figure 19).
Trends over time
Between 2018–19 and 2020–21, ED presentation rates decreased from 297 to 232 per 100,000 population and were higher for females than males (Figure 19).
Seasonal variation was also noted for asthma ED presentation rates though this has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic since March 2020 (for COVID-19 pandemic timelines see ABS 2021).
- In 2019, rates were relatively high between March and August (24 to 29 per 100,000 population per month).
- From March to May 2020 ED presentation rates more than halved (from 26 per 100,000 to 11 per 100,000 population). This decrease is likely due to the nationwide lockdown which began on 23 March related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
- ED presentations rose slightly from May 2020, when COVID-19 restrictions began to ease (Figure 19).
Variation between population groups
In 2020–21, the highest rate of ED presentations was reported for people living in Remote areas (430 per 100,000 population), and the lowest was reported for those living in Major cities (200 per 100,000 population) (Figure 19).
ED presentation rates were higher in the lowest socioeconomic group (living in the areas with the highest level of disadvantage) compared with the highest socioeconomic group (living in areas with the lowest level of disadvantage) in 2020–21 (305 compared with 145 per 100,000 population).
The following dashboard can be used to explore the data in more detail.
Figure 19: Emergency department presentations due to asthma, by sex and age, remoteness area and socioeconomic group, by month, 2018–19 to 2020–21
This bar chart shows emergency department (ED) presentations for asthma by remoteness area and socioeconomic group in 2020–21. The highest rate of ED presentations was reported for people living in Remote areas (430 per 100,000 population), and the lowest was reported for those living in Major cities (200 per 100,000 population). Meanwhile, ED presentation rates were higher in the lowest socioeconomic group (living in the areas with the highest level of disadvantage) compared with the highest socioeconomic group (living in areas with the lowest level of disadvantage) (306 compared with 146 per 100,000 population).
This bar chart shows emergency department (ED) presentations for asthma by age and sex in 2020–21. Boys aged 0–14 were 1.6 times as likely as girls of the same age to present to the emergency department for asthma. Females had higher rates of presentation to ED than males for all other age groups.
This line chart shows ED presentation rates for asthma by sex from 2018–2019 to 2020–21. ED presentation rates decreased from 297 to 232 per 100,000 population overall and were higher for females than males for all years.
This line chart shows ED presentation rates for asthma by month from January 2019 to December 2020. In 2019, rates were relatively high between March and August (24 to 29 per 100,000 population per month). From March to May 2020, ED presentation rates more than halved (from 26 to 11 per 100,000 population per month). Presentations fluctuated from May 2020 between 13 and 23 per 100,000 population per month).

Comorbidities of asthma
Some people with asthma have other chronic and long-term conditions. This is called ‘comorbidity’, which describes any additional disease that is experienced by a person with a disease of interest (the index disease). For people with asthma, having a comorbid chronic condition can have important implications for their health outcomes, quality of life and treatment choices.
Number of comorbid chronic conditions in people with asthma
In 2020–21, around 1.2 million people aged 45 and over, who currently have asthma, also reported having one or more of the following selected chronic conditions:
- arthritis
- back problems
- cancer
- chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
- diabetes
- heart, stroke, and vascular disease
- kidney disease
- mental and behavioural conditions
- osteoporosis.
Just under a third (30%) had one other selected chronic condition, and 47% had 2 or more other selected chronic conditions (Figure 20).
These 9 chronic conditions have been selected because they are common in the general community, pose significant health problems, have been the focus of ongoing national surveillance efforts, and action can be taken to prevent their occurrence (ABS 2022b). See the National Health Survey: First Results methodology 2020–21 (ABS 2022c) for more information.
Asthma affects people of all ages; however, many of the people with asthma and comorbid conditions are older Australians, reflecting the fact that chronic conditions are more widespread in older age groups (AIHW 2022a).
Additional chronic conditions that are commonly found in people with asthma, and that can impact on asthma, include allergic rhinitis, obstructive sleep apnoea, mental illness, nasal polyps (soft, painless, non-cancerous growths) and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) (Bardin et al. 2018; Cazzola et al. 2012).
Types of self-reported comorbid chronic conditions in people with asthma
Among people aged 45 and over with asthma:
- 42% had arthritis (compared with 26% among people without asthma)
- 33% had back problems (compared with 23% among people without asthma)
- 20% had mental and behavioural conditions (compared with 11% among people without asthma)
- 14% had COPD (compared with 1.9% among people without asthma)
- 31% had heart, stroke, and vascular disease (compared with 22% among people without asthma)
- 13% had osteoporosis (compared with 7.6% among people without asthma) (Figure 20).
The following dashboard can be used to explore the data in more detail.
Figure 20: Comorbidity and prevalence of selected chronic conditions in people aged 45 and over with and without asthma, 2020–21
This bar chart shows the proportion of people with asthma with other chronic conditions in 2020–21. Among people with asthma, 23% had asthma only, 30% had one other chronic condition, and 47% had two or more other chronic conditions.
This bar chart shows the prevalence of chronic conditions in people with and without asthma in 2020–21. Among people with asthma, 42% had arthritis (compared with 26% among people without asthma), 33% had back problems (compared with 23% among people without asthma), 20% had mental and behavioural conditions (compared with 11% among people without asthma), 31% had heart, stroke, and vascular disease (compared with 22% among people without asthma) and 13% had osteoporosis (compared with 8% among people without asthma).

The risk factor definitions used in the ABS 2020–21 National Health Survey (NHS) are described below. These have not changed since the 2017–18 NHS. Note that reporting of the risk factor measures has been limited to those aged 18 and over due to:
- small numbers reported below the age of 18
- the nature of the questions asked and the survey methodology (parent or guardian answered on child’s behalf for 0–14year olds, for 15–17 years olds parental/guardian consent was sought and where consent not provided a parent/guardian answered question on the selected persons behalf (ABS 2022a)
- for consistency in reporting of the quality of life measures.
Definitions for risk factors in the National Health Survey
Smoker status
This refers to the frequency of smoking of tobacco, including manufactured (packet) cigarettes, roll-your-own cigarettes, cigars, and pipes, but excluding chewing tobacco, e-cigarettes (and similar) and smoking of non-tobacco products. Table 1 below provides more information on the categories of smoker status used.
Smoking status | Categories |
---|---|
Current daily smoker | A respondent who reported at the time of interview that they regularly smoked one or more cigarettes, cigars, or pipes per day. |
Current smoker – Other (occasional) | A respondent who reported at the time of interview that they smoked cigarettes, cigars, or pipes, less frequently than daily. |
Ex-smoker | A respondent who reported that they did not currently smoke, but had regularly smoked daily, or had smoked at least 100 cigarettes, or smoked pipes, cigars, etc at least 20 times in their lifetime. |
Never smoked | A respondent who reported they had never regularly smoked daily, and had smoked less than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime and had smoked pipes, cigars, etc less than 20 times |
Source: ABS 2022d.
Physical activity
Physical activity refers to a combination of exercise and workplace activity. Exercise includes walking for transport, walking for fitness, sport or recreation, moderate exercise and/or vigorous exercise undertaken in the last week. Workplace activity is physical activity undertaken in the workplace which includes moderate and/or vigorous activity undertaken on a typical workday.
Australia’s Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines, released in 2014, are assessed against the respective age group for NHS data.The 2014 Guidelines recommend that:
- Children and young people (5–17 years) accumulate at least 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity every day, from a variety of activities including some vigorous, and do muscle strengthening activities on at least three days each week
- Adults (18–64 years) should be active most days of the week, accumulate 150 to 300 minutes moderate intensity physical activity or 75 to 150 minutes of vigorous intensity physical activity (or an equivalent combination each week), and do muscle strengthening activities on at least two days each week
- Older Australians (65 years and over) should accumulate at least 30 minutes of moderate intensity physical activity on most, preferably all, days.
‘Minutes undertook physical activity’ is based on respondents meeting the recommended guideline of at least 150 minutes of physical activity a week. Minutes spent on vigorous activity is multiplied by a factor of two.
For more information, see Australia's Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines.
Body mass index
Body mass index (BMI) is a simple index of weight-for-height that is commonly used to classify underweight, normal weight, overweight and obesity. It is calculated from height and weight information, using the formula weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m). To produce a measure of the prevalence of underweight, normal weight, overweight or obesity in adults, BMI values are grouped according to Table 2 below.
Category | Range |
---|---|
Underweight | Less than 18.50 |
Normal range | 18.50 —24.99 |
Overweight | 25.00 — 29.99 |
Obese I | 30.00 — 34.99 |
Obesity class II | 35.00 — 39.99 |
Obesity class III | 40.00 or more |
Height and weight data used to assess overweight and obesity can be gathered from survey respondents by:
- direct physical measurement (the method used in the NHS to derive BMI)
- asking respondents to self-report their height and weight.
Three ABS National Health Surveys (1995, 2007–08 and 2017–18) collected height and weight using both methods. While self-reported height and weight is logistically simpler to collect, this method is less accurate because of the tendency for people to over-report their height and under-report their weight.
In 2020–21, only self-reported height, weight and body mass was collected due to the online data collection method. For more details, see Self-reported height and weight.
Definitions for chronic conditions in the National Health Survey
In the National Health Survey (NHS), a long-term health condition was defined as a medical condition (illness, injury or disability) which was current at the time of interview and had lasted, or was expected to last, 6 months or more.
Some reported conditions were assumed to be long-term, including asthma, arthritis, cancer, osteoporosis, diabetes, sight problems, rheumatic heart disease, heart attack, angina, heart failure and stroke. Diabetes, rheumatic heart disease, heart attack, angina, heart failure and stroke were also assumed to be current. Respondents could report multiple health conditions. Table 3 below provides further details on the definitions used for each chronic condition.
Any reported health conditions that did not meet this definition were excluded from estimates, e.g. a person may have been told that they had a health condition in the past but it is no longer current or expected to last 6 months or more.
The classification hierarchy is based on the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). The classification was updated for the 2020–21 NHS to improve use of the conditions data. See the Data Item List for full details of the conditions classification used in the 2020–21 NHS.
Condition | Current | Long term | Has the condition been diagnosed by a doctor or nurse? |
---|---|---|---|
Arthritis | current | long term | no diagnosis required |
Asthma | current | long term | no diagnosis required |
Back problems | current | long term | no diagnosis required |
Cancer | current | long term | no diagnosis required |
COPD | current | long term | no diagnosis required |
Diabetes (2 combinations) |
current | long term | no diagnosis required |
Diabetes (2 combinations) |
ever had | not long term | diagnosis required |
Heart, stroke, and vascular disease (HSVD) (2 combinations) |
current | long term | no diagnosis required |
Heart, stroke, and vascular disease (HSVD) (2 combinations) |
ever had | not long term | diagnosis required |
Kidney disease | current | long term | no diagnosis required |
Mental and behavioural conditions | current | long term | no diagnosis required |
Osteoporosis | current | long term | no diagnosis required |
Note: Please see the 2017–18 NHS User Guide and 2020–21 NHS: First Results methodology for more information on the definitions of the conditions.
ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (2018) National Health Survey: Users’ Guide, 2017–18, accessed 1 February 2023.
ABS (2018) Self-reported height and weight, accessed 12 May 2023.
ABS (2019) National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Survey, 2018–19, ABS Cat. no. 4715.0. Canberra: ABS, accessed 9 March 2023.
ABS (2021) Impact of lockdowns on household consumption - insights from alternative data sources, accessed 28 February 2023.
ABS (2022a) Asthma 2020–2021, accessed 9 February 2023.
ABS (2022b) Health conditions prevalence, accessed 13 February 2023.
ABS (2022c) 2020–21 NHS: First Results methodology, accessed 10 March 2023.
ABS (2022d) Smoking, ABS Website, accessed 7 June 2023.
ACAM (Australian Centre for Asthma Monitoring) (2011) Asthma in Australia 2011, AIHW Asthma Series no. 4. Cat. no. ACM 22, Canberra: AIHW, accessed 3 February 2023.
AIHW (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare) (2018) Australia's health 2018, Chapter 4 Determinants of health, Australia's health series no. 16. Cat. no. AUS 221, Canberra: AIHW, accessed 3 February 2023.
AIHW (2021a) Australian Burden of Disease Study 2018: Interactive data on disease burden, AIHW, Australian Government, accessed 22 May 2023.
AIHW (2021b) Chronic health conditions among culturally and linguistically diverse Australians, 2021, AIHW, Australian Government, accessed 9 March 2023.
AIHW (2021c) Data update: Short-term health impacts of the 2019–20 Australian bushfires, AIHW, Australian Government, accessed 15 March 2022.
AIHW (2022a) Australia's health 2022, Australia’s health series no. 18. AUS 241, Canberra: AIHW, accessed 4 February 2023.
AIHW (2022b) Australian Burden of Disease Study 2022, AIHW, Australian Government, accessed 19 May 2023. doi:10.25816/e2v0-gp02.
AIHW (2022c) Disease expenditure in Australia 2019–20, AIHW, Australian Government, accessed 19 May 2023.
AIHW (2022d) Health system spending per case of disease and for certain risk factors, AIHW, Australian Government, accessed 19 May 2023.
AIHW (2023) Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework, Indicator 1.04 Respiratory disease (Data Table D1.04.1)/ Data - AIHW Indigenous HPF, accessed 17 February 2023.
Asthma Australia (2022) Asthma Guidelines for Australian Schools, accessed 27 April 2023.
Athanazio R (2012) Airway disease: similarities and differences between asthma, COPD, and bronchiectasis. Clinics 67(11):1335, accessed 9 March 2023.
Bardin PG, Rangaswamy J and Yo SW (2018) Managing comorbid conditions in severe asthma, The Medical Journal of Australia 209(2):S11-S17, accessed 10 March 2023.
Beasley R, Semprini A and Mitchel EA (2015) Risk factors for asthma: is prevention possible? Lancet 386:1075-85. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00156-7, accessed 7 March 2023.
Britt H, Miller GC, Bayram C, Henderson J, Valenti L, Harrison C, Pan Y, Charles J, Pollack AJ, Wong C, Gordon J (2016) General practice activity in Australia 2015–16, General practice series no. 40. Sydney: Sydney University Press accessed 5 May 2023.
Cazzola M, Calzetta L, Bettoncelli G, Cricelli C, Romeo F, Matera MG and Rogliani P (2012) Cardiovascular disease in asthma and COPD: A population-based retrospective cross-sectional study. Respiratory Medicine 106 (2):249-56. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2011.07.021, accessed 10 March 2023.
Chang A, Bell S, Byrnes C, Dawkins P, Holland A, Kennedy E, King P et al. (2023) Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ) position statement on chronic suppurative lung disease and bronchiectasis in children, adolescents and adults in Australia and New Zealand, Respirology Epub 2023 Mar 2, accessed 28 April 2023.
Cukic V, Lovre V, Dragisic D and Ustamujic A (2012) Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) – differences and similarities, MateriaSocioMedica 24(2):100–105, accessed 8 March 2023.
Deloitte Access Economics (2015) The Hidden Cost of Asthma: Asthma Australia and National Asthma Council Australia, accessed 27 April 2023.
Dharmage SC, Perret JL and Custovic A (2019) Epidemiology and asthma in children and adults, Frontiers in Pediatrics 7:246, accessed 7 March 2023.
DoHAC:TGA (Department of Health and Aged Care: Therapeutic Goods Administration) (2020), COVID-19 limits on dispensing and sales at pharmacies, accessed 9 March 2023.
Freitas P, Xavier R, McDonald V, Gibson P, Cordova-Rivera L, Furlanetto K, de Oliveira J, Carvalho-Pinto R, Cukier A, Stelmach R and Carvalho C (2021) Identification of asthma phenotypes based on extrapulmonary treatable traits, European Respiratory Journal 57:2000240, accessed 27 April 2023.
GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) (2019), Pocket guide for asthma management and prevention (for adults and children older than 5 years), accessed 9 March 2023.
Kang HR, Choi GS, Park SJ, Park SJ, Song YK, Kim JM, Ha J, Lee YH, Lee YH, Lee BH, Kim SH and Lee JH (2014) The Effects of Bronchiectasis on Asthma Exacerbation. Tuberculosis & Respiratory Disease, 77(5): 209-214, accessed 9 March 2023.
Kim S, Sutherland ER and Gelfand EW (2014) Is there a link between obesity and asthma? Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research 6(3):189-195, accessed 9 March 2023.
Liu JC, Pereira G, Uhl SA, Bravo MA and Bell ML (2015) A systematic review of the physical health impacts from non-occupational exposure to wildfire smoke, Environmental Research, 136:120–132, doi:10.1016/j.envres.2014.10.015, accessed 9 March 2023.
McDonald V, Hiles S, Godbout K, Harvey E, Marks G, Hew M, Peters M et al. (2018) Treatable traits can be identified in a severe asthma registry and predict future exacerbations, Offical Journal of the Asian Pacific Society of Repirology, 24(1): 37-47, accessed 27 April 2023.
NAC (National Asthma Campaign) (1990) Asthma Management Plan, Melbourne: National Asthma Campaign.
NACA (National Asthma Council Australia) (2018) National Asthma Strategy, Melbourne: National Asthma Council Australia, accessed 9 March 2023.
NACA (2019) Thunderstorm asthma, Melbourne: National Asthma Council Australia, accessed 9 February 2023.
NACA (2022) Australian Asthma Handbook, Version 2.2. Melbourne: National Asthma Council Australia, accessed 3 March 2023.
Parliament of Australia (2020) 2019–20 bushfires—frequently asked questions: a quick guide, Parliament of Australia, Australian Government, accessed 9 March 2023.
Peters U, Dixon A and Forno E (2018) Obesity and asthma, Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 141(4):1169–1179, accessed 3 March 2023.
Pollack AJ, Chambers T, Gordon J and Wong C (2016) A decade of Australian general practice activity 2006–07 to 2015–16, General practice series no. 41. Sydney: Sydney University Press, accessed 9 March 2023.
Polosa R and Thomson NC (2013) Smoking and asthma: dangerous liaisons. European Respiratory Journal 41:716–726, accessed 3 March 2023.
PSA (Pharmaceutical Society of Australia) (2022) COVID-19 information for pharmacists, accessed 9 March 2023.
RACGP (The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners) (2022), Upcoming MBS changes GPs need to know, accessed 27 April 2023.
Reddel H (2020) Updated Australian guidelines on the treatment of mild asthma: what’s changed and why? Australian Prescriber 43:220–224, accessed 27 April 2023.
Roche N, Postma DS, Colice G, Burden A, Guilbert TW, Israel E, Martin RJ, Van Aalderen WMC, Grigg J, Hillyer EV, von Ziegenweidt, J and Price DB (2015) Differential effects of inhaled corticosteroids in smokers/ ex-smokers and non-smokers with asthma, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 191(8): 960–964, accessed 27 February 2023.
Rota AP, Bacharier LB, Jaffee K, et al. (2017) Screen Time Engagement Is Increased in Urban Children With Asthma. Clinical Pediatrics. 2017;56(11):1048-1053, doi:10.1177/0009922817698801, accessed 12 May 2023.
Stanford Children’s Health (2020) Management and Treatment of Asthma, California: Stanford Children’s Health, accessed 10 February 2023.
Thien F, Beggs PJ, Csutoros D, Darvall J, Hew M, Davies JM, Bardin PG, Bannister T, Barnes S, Bellomo R, Byrne T, Casamento A, Conron M, Cross A, Crosswell A, Douglass JA, Durie M, Dyett J, Ebert E, Erbas B and French C (2018) The Melbourne epidemic thunderstorm asthma event 2016: an investigation of environmental triggers, effect on health services, and patient risk factors, Lancet Planet Health, 2(6):e255–e263, doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30120-7, accessed 9 February 2023.
Victoria State Government (2022) Epidemic thunderstorm asthma forecast, Victoria State Government website, accessed 9 March 2023.
Wakefield MA, Coomber K, Durkin SJ, Scollo M, Bayly M, Spittal MJ, Simpson JA, Hill D (2014) Time series analysis of the impact of tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence among Australian adults, 2001–2011, Bulletin of the World Health Organization 92:413-22, accessed 3 February 2023.
WHO (World Health Organisation) (2017) Asthma, Geneva: WHO, accessed 5 February 2023.