Clients, services and outcomes

Specialist homelessness agencies provide a wide range of services to assist those who are experiencing homelessness or who are at risk of homelessness, ranging from general support and assistance to immediate crisis accommodation. Characteristics of all clients assisted by specialist homelessness services (SHS) in 2020–21 are described below, including their need/s for assistance and the services they received.

Key findings: SHS clients, services and outcomes 2020–21

This diagram shows a number of key findings including the number of clients supported by SHS agencies in 2020–21, the number of returning and new clients, the rate at which clients received support, the proportion of clients with selected vulnerabilities, the proportion of clients experiencing homelessness at the start of support compared to the end of support and the most common main reasons for seeking assistance.

SHS clients at a glance

The number of clients assisted by specialist homelessness agencies increased to almost 278,300 in 2020–21 from 236,400 in 2011–12; an average annual increase of 1.8% since 2011–12. The rate of SHS clients increased from 105.8 clients per 10,000 population in 2011–12 to 108.3 clients in 2020–21 (Table HIST.CLIENTS).

It is important to note, the Specialist Homelessness Services Collection (SHSC) data provide a measure of service response. Changes in client numbers reflect the agency engagement of people which is not necessarily a change in the underlying level of homelessness in Australia.

Characteristics of clients

In 2020–21, 39% of SHS clients were first time clients since the collection began in July 2011. The characteristics of clients, the main reasons for seeking assistance, and the services that had been supplied to clients, have remained relatively stable over the 5 years to 2020–21. Key changes include:

  • The number of SHS clients with a current mental health issue increased; around 88,200 (32% of all SHS clients) in 2020–21 compared with almost 77,300 (27%) in 2016–17 (Historical table HIST.MH).
  • The number of SHS clients who have experienced family and domestic violence increased; almost 116,200 (42% of all SHS clients) in 2020–21 compared with 114,800 (40%) in 2016–17 to (Historical table HIST.FDV).
  • Length of support has increased with the median number of days a client was supported increasing to 51 days in 2020–21 to 37 days in 2016–17 (Supplementary table CLIENTS.44).
  • In 2020–21, the number of females presenting homeless (57,600) was higher than the number of males (53,500); similar for females (57,500) and fewer males (54,200) than in 2016–17 (Supplementary tables CLIENTS.11 and CLIENTS.37).

Age and sex

Reporting sex in the Specialist Homelessness Services Collection (SHSC)

The additional category ‘Other’ has been added to the question which records the person’s sex and applies to support periods and unassisted instances starting on or after 1 July 2019. Analysis of the updated 2020–21 sex of client data demonstrated some variable data quality and consistency of use among services. Consistent to the approach adopted for the 2019–20 Annual Report, for the 2020–21 Annual Report these clients were combined with the ‘Female’ category for reporting purposes only. For further information, please see the Technical notes.

In 2020–21 (Figure CLIENTS.1):

  • The majority of clients were female (60% or almost 167,400 clients).
  • 3 in 10 clients were aged under 18 (28% or over 78,500).
  • Among adult clients, the largest age group was those aged 25–34, accounting for almost 1 in 5 clients (19%), most of whom were female (69%).
  • The overall rate of SHS clients was higher for females: 1 in 77 females in the Australian population received support compared with 1 in 115 males.
  • Per 10,000 population, the highest rate of clients among all age groups were those aged 15–17 years: higher for females (224.0 per 10,000 population) than for males (146.2).
  • The lowest rate of clients was for those aged 65 and over (20.1 per 10,000 population): higher for females (21.4 per 10,000 population) than males (18.6).

Figure CLIENTS.1: Clients by age and sex, states and territories, 2020–21

This interactive horizontal population pyramid shows the marked differences between the age profiles of male and female SHS clients. Data are presented for the number of SHS clients, the rate of service use of SHS clients, and the number of support periods. The highest numbers of male clients were aged 0 to 9 years while females aged 25–34 were the age group with the highest number.

Indigenous status

In 2020–21, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people continued to be over-represented among SHS clients with more than one-quarter of clients (28% or almost 73,300) who provided information on their Indigenous status identifying as being of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander origin (Supplementary table INDIGENOUS.2). Nationally, this equated to 810.6 Indigenous clients per 10,000 Indigenous population compared with a rate of 80.2 for non-Indigenous clients.

For further information please see Indigenous clients.

State and territory

The largest number of clients accessed services in Victoria (105,500), followed by New South Wales (70,600) and Queensland (41,200) (Supplementary table CLIENTS.1), noting that clients may have accessed services in more than one state or territory.

  • The highest rate of SHS clients was in the Northern Territory where there were 411.5 clients per 10,000 population, followed by Victoria (157.6) and Tasmania (121.5) (Figure CLIENTS.2).
  • Females had higher rates of service use than males across all states and territories; the Northern Territory had the most pronounced difference between males and females where 535.1 per 10,000 females received services compared with 294.3 per 10,000 males (Supplementary table CLIENTS.1).
  • More than half of clients (61%) in 2020–21 had previously received SHS support at some point since the collection began in July 2011. The proportion of returning clients varied across jurisdictions with South Australia reporting the highest proportion (67%) and New South Wales the lowest (57%) (Supplementary table CLIENTS.2).

Figure CLIENTS.2: Clients, by state and territory, 2020–21

This interactive bar graph shows the number of SHS clients, the rate of service use of SHS clients, and the number of support periods, for each of the states and territories. The Northern Territory had the highest rate and Queensland had the lowest rate.

Country of birth

Almost 9 in 10 clients (87% or 222,750 clients) of specialist homelessness agencies in 2020–21 were born in Australia (Supplementary table CLIENTS.3), higher than the general Australian population (70% were born in Australia; ABS 2021). Of those clients who reported their country of birth and were born overseas, the most common country of birth was New Zealand (1.6%) (Supplementary table CLIENTS.4). Over half of clients (58%) who were born overseas had arrived in Australia in 2011 or before (Supplementary table CLIENTS.5). Almost 9 in 10 (86% or almost 28,700) clients who were born overseas lived in Major cities (Supplementary table CLIENTS.6).


Main language spoken at home other than English

In 2020–21, the most common language spoken at home by SHS clients other than English was Aboriginal English (so described) (22%), followed by Arabic (11%) and Vietnamese (3.2%) (Supplementary table CLIENTS.7).

Proficiency in spoken English

In 2020–21, proficiency was highest among clients whose main language spoken at home (other than English) was grouped as Northern European languages (other than English), with 74% of clients reporting they spoke English very well and a further 20% reporting they spoke English well. English proficiency was lowest among clients whose main language other than English was grouped as Eastern Asian languages, with 25% rating their English proficiency as very well (Supplementary table CLIENTS.8).

Living arrangements

Living alone may be a sign of social disadvantage (De Vaus and Qu 2015). For some, it is associated with lower income, low participation in the labour force and lower levels of education. Living alone has also been shown to be a substantial risk factor for loneliness (AIHW 2021). With limited economic resources and social networks, lone persons may be more vulnerable to homelessness. In 2016, 24% of households in Australia consisted of a lone person (ABS 2017).

The most common living arrangement reported by clients at the beginning of support in 2020–21 was lone parent with 1 or more children (33% or over 84,900), followed by lone persons (32% or over 82,000) and other family groups (13% or about 32,400) (Supplementary table CLIENTS.10). Female clients were more likely than male clients to be living as a single parent with 1 or more children (39% females compared with 23% males) while males were more likely than females to be living alone (42% males compared with 24% females). Among the states and territories, Tasmania (45%) and the Australian Capital Territory (44%) had higher proportions of SHS clients living alone than the national rate (32%). Queensland (38%) had the highest proportion of clients living as a single parent with child/ren.

Selected vulnerabilities

Many clients face additional challenges that may make them more vulnerable to experiencing homelessness. The selected additional vulnerabilities presented here include family and domestic violence, experiencing a current mental health issue and/or problematic drug and/or alcohol use. Clients may have one or any of these additional selected vulnerabilities.

In 2020–21, of the more than 234,000 clients aged 10 and over, 3 in 5 (63%) reported experiencing one or more of the selected vulnerabilities (Supplementary table CLIENTS.43, Figure CLIENTS.3):

  • 2 in 5 reported a family and domestic violence (39% or almost 91,400 clients)
  • almost 2 in 5 reported a current mental health issue (38% or over 88,200 clients)
  • more than 1 in 10 reported problematic drug and or alcohol use (12% or over 27,200 clients)
  • very few (3.7% or over 8,600 clients) reported experiencing all 3 vulnerabilities
  • almost 2 in 5 (37% or almost 86,500 clients) reported experiencing none of these vulnerabilities.

Figure CLIENTS.3: SHS clients, by selected vulnerability characteristics, 2020–21

The bar graph shows the number of SHS clients that experienced one or more of the additional selected vulnerabilities, including family and domestic violence, experiencing a current mental health issue and problematic drug and/or alcohol use. The graph shows both the number of clients experiencing a single vulnerability as well as combinations of vulnerabilities.

National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS)

The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS)

The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) supports people with a permanent and significant disability which affects their ability to take part in everyday activities. It is jointly governed and funded by the Australian and participating states and territory governments. The NDIS began its national rollout on 1 July 2016, and had been made available to all eligible Australians as of 1 July 2020 (NDIS 2020). Further details about the NDIS are provided in the Technical notes.

NDIS participation indicator

The NDIS participation indicator was introduced into the Specialist Homelessness Services Collection (SHSC) from 1 July 2019. A participant in the NDIS is an individual who reports they are receiving an agreed package of support through the National Disability Insurance Scheme. The NDIS question is asked of all clients at the start of a support period by SHS agency. Data are only available for clients who only had support period(s) starting from 1 July 2019 onwards.

In 2020–21, 4.1% (around 9,500) of SHS clients indicated that they were receiving a package of support through the NDIS, ranging from 2.1% in the Northern Territory to 5.8% in Victoria. There was a high level of not stated responses for this measure: around 42,000 clients in 2020–21 (Supplementary table CLIENTS.17), similar to the previous year.

Housing situation on first presentation

Among those clients whose housing status was known at the beginning of their first support period in 2020–21 (supplementary table CLIENTS.11):

  • Most (57% or around 144,500 clients) were at risk of homelessness rather than homeless (43% or more than 111,100 clients) (Figure CLIENTS.4).
  • More than 1 in 3 clients (31% or more than 86,700) were living in private or other housing (renter, rent-free, or owner).
  • The proportion of males (52%) who were experiencing homelessness was higher than for females (38%).

Figure CLIENTS.4: Clients by housing situation at the beginning of support, 2020–21

The stacked vertical bar graph shows proportions of male and female clients by 6 housing situations captured in the SHSC. For those clients who were homeless, greater numbers were in either short-term or emergency accommodation, or couch surfing or no tenure. For those clients housed, but at risk of homelessness, most were in private or other housing when they sought homelessness services.

Of those clients with no shelter/improvised dwelling (more than 24,300 clients), 45% were sleeping in no dwelling, either on the street, in a park or out in the open and a further 22% (1 in 5) were sleeping in a car (Supplementary table CLIENTS.13).

Main source of income

Income support was high among SHS clients with 81% of clients aged 15 and over receiving some form of government payment as their main source of income at the time they sought support in 2020–21 (Supplementary table CLIENTS.16). The most common government payments were JobSeeker (33% or 60,350 clients), Parenting Payment (17% or 30,900) and Disability Support Pension (15% or 27,700). Around 1 in 10 (8.7%) of clients reported income from employment as their main source and 9.1% reported having no income.

As of 20 March 2020, JobSeeker Payment was introduced to replace Newstart Allowance. Existing recipients of Newstart Allowance were transferred to the new JobSeeker Payment. From this date, if a client reports that they are receiving ‘JobSeeker Payment’ it is recorded under the existing ‘Newstart Allowance’ category. During this time, JobKeeper payment was also introduced, to help businesses affected by the COVID-19 pandemic to cover the costs of their employees’ wages, and for employees to retain jobs and continue to earn an income. As the JobKeeper payment is made to businesses and not individuals, if a client reports they are receiving ‘JobKeeper Payment’ it is recorded under the ‘Employee income’ category.


Of those whose educational status was known, over half of clients aged 5–24 (54% or over 45,300) were enrolled in some form of education in 2020–21 (Supplementary table CLIENTS.18). Almost 9 in 10 (87%) clients aged 5–14 were enrolled in school or other types of education, 13% of clients aged 5–14 (about 4,300) were not enrolled in education. Around two-thirds (68%) of clients aged 15–24 were not in some form of education (around 34,200 clients).

Labour force

Around 97,100 (53%) clients aged 15 or over were unemployed at the beginning of support in 2020–21 (Supplementary table CLIENTS.19). Males (59%) were more likely to be unemployed than females (49%). Almost 64,000 (35%) clients were not in the labour force. More than 1 in 10 (13%) clients were employed and of these, 3 in 5 (61%) were employed on a part-time basis.

Clients service use in 2020–21

Support periods

Data collected by specialist homelessness agencies are based on support periods or episodes of assistance provided to clients (see Technical notes for further information). Clients may have had more than 1 support period in 2020–21, either with the same agency at different times or with different agencies. In 2020–21:

  • Clients assisted by homelessness agencies had almost 507,000 support periods. The number of support periods has increased by an average annual growth of 3.0% each year since 2011–12 (Historical table HIST.CLIENTS).
  • Two-thirds of clients had only 1 support period (65%) while 1 in 5 (20%) had 2 support periods, 7.3% had 3 support periods and 8.6% had 4 or more (Supplementary table CLIENTS.26).
  • The majority of support periods were opened and closed within 2020–21 (73% or around 371,900). An additional 13% of support periods opened during the year and remained open on 30 June 2021. Just 2.5% were ongoing throughout the 2020–21 reporting period (Figure CLIENTS.5).

Figure CLIENTS.5: Support periods, by indicative duration over the reporting period, 2020–21

The figure shows collection periods from 2019–20 to 2021–22. Bars indicate the proportion of support periods opened in one reporting period and closed in the same or the subsequent period. Arrows indicate ongoing support, opening either in 2019–20 or 2020–21 and remaining open into 2021–22. Most support periods began and ended in 2020–21 (73%25); 13%25 remained opened. Just 2.5%25 of support periods that opened in 2019–20 remained open the entire reporting period.

Source: Specialist Homelessness Services Collection 2020–21, Supplementary table CLIENTS.27

Number of days clients received support

In 2020–21, 27.7 million support days were provided by SHS agencies to clients.

  • The median number of support days for clients was 51 days, similar for males (50 days) and females (52 days), while clients received an average of 1.8 support periods (Supplementary table CLIENTS.28 and CLIENTS.44).
  • The proportion of SHS clients receiving accommodation has been constant over time from 30% in 2016–17 to 31% in 2020–21, while the median number of nights accommodated has decreased, from 33 nights in 2016–17 to 31 nights in 2020–21 (Supplementary table CLIENTS.44).
  • The needs of some clients can be met relatively quickly but clients with more complex needs received more support. Three in 10 clients (29% or more than 81,800) received between 6 and 45 days of support during 2020–21, while 18% received support for up to 5 days. Nineteen per cent received over 180 days of support; while 17% received support for 91–180 days (Supplementary table CLIENTS.28).

Reasons that support ended

  • More than half (57%) of support periods ended in 2020–21 because the client’s immediate needs were met or case management goals were achieved (Supplementary table CLIENTS.29).
  • Almost one-quarter (23%) of support periods ended because the client no longer requested assistance; that is, a client may have decided that they no longer required assistance or they may have moved from the state/territory or region.
  • A further 13% of support periods closed because the client was referred to another specialist homelessness agency and 13% closed because contact was lost with the client.

Clients’ needs for assistance and services provided

The SHSC includes information about clients’ needs for services from two perspectives:

  • The client’s reasons for seeking assistance at the start of support—both the main reason for seeking support and all reasons for seeking support are collected.
  • The agency worker’s assessment of the client’s needs—this information is captured when clients first present for assistance and each month while a client is still in contact with the agency.

Technical information and Glossary provide more information about how clients’ needs for assistance are captured in the SHSC.

Services provided to clients range from the direct provision of accommodation, such as a bed in a shelter, to more specialised services such as counselling and legal support. These services are generally either provided to the client directly by the agency or the client is referred to another service. Unmet need provides further information about clients’ needs that went unmet.

Reasons for seeking assistance

SHS clients can identify a number of reasons for seeking assistance, reflecting the range of situations that contribute to housing instability. SHS agencies also record the main reason for clients seeking assistance. In terms of the reasons why clients generally sought assistance in 2020–21 (Supplementary table CLIENTS.20):

  • Accommodation issues (including housing crisis, inadequate or inappropriate dwelling conditions or that previous accommodation had ended) were nominated by 53% of clients (or around 146,600 clients).
  • More than one-third (34% of clients) were experiencing housing crisis.
  • A high proportion were experiencing financial difficulties, identified by 39% of clients, while over 1 in 4 clients were affected by housing affordability stress (29%).
  • Interpersonal and relationship issues, including family and domestic violence, affected over half of all SHS clients (54% or about 148,100 clients). Within this group, 39% identified family and domestic violence.

The main reasons for seeking assistance in 2020–21 were similar to the reasons why clients generally sought assistance from SHS agencies (Supplementary table CLIENTS.21, Figure CLIENTS.6):

  • Family and domestic violence was the most common main reason identified for seeking assistance for almost 1 in 3 clients (29% or more than 79,300 clients). For more information, see Clients experiencing family and domestic violence.
  • Almost 1 in 6 (18% or around 48,400) identified housing crisis as the main reason for seeking assistance.

Figure CLIENTS.6: Main reasons for seeking assistance (top 6), by homelessness status, 2020–21

The stacked vertical bar graph shows the most common main reasons for seeking assistance for male and female clients. Family and domestic violence was the most common main reason for seeking assistance, followed by housing crisis. Inadequate dwelling conditions, financial difficulties, housing affordability stress and relationship/family breakdown were the next most common main reasons for seeking assistance.

For those clients presenting at risk of homelessness, the most common main reasons for seeking assistance were (Supplementary table CLIENTS.22):

  • family and domestic violence (34%)
  • housing crisis (15%)
  • financial difficulties (12%).

For those clients presenting as homeless, the most common main reasons for seeking assistance were:

  • housing crisis (23%)
  • inadequate or inappropriate dwelling conditions (19%)
  • family and domestic violence (17%).

Housing and accommodation services

Housing and accommodation services provided by agencies include support to access:

  • short-term or emergency accommodation
  • medium-term/transitional housing
  • long-term housing
  • assistance to sustain tenancy or prevent tenancy failure or eviction
  • assistance to prevent foreclosures or for mortgage arrears.

In 2020–21, 60% of SHS clients identified a need for accommodation services. Of these 166,900 clients:

  • 86,600 (52%) were provided with accommodation by the agency
  • 26,500 (16%) were referred to another agency for accommodation provision
  • 53,900 (32%) were neither provided nor referred for assistance. These clients are further described in Unmet need.

Assistance to sustain tenancy/prevent eviction was needed by 32% of clients at some stage during their support in 2020–21. This group includes those who were still housed when they approached a SHS agency and were supported to remain in that housing. It also includes those who identified a need for accommodation, were assisted to secure new housing and then supported to sustain that housing. Most clients (74,000 clients, or about 82% of those who needed it) received assistance to sustain tenancy directly from the specialist homelessness agency.

General support and assistance

Some types of assistance provided by SHS agencies can be described as ‘general support and assistance’, compared with more specialised services. These services include advice and information, material aid, meals and living skills. In 2020–21:

  • Clients most commonly needed advice and information, needed by 78% of clients (more than 217,600). The next most common need was advocacy and liaison, needed by 55% of clients (more than 154,200) and material aid/brokerage which was needed by 35% of clients (more than 98,600) (Supplementary table CLIENTS.23, Figure CLIENTS.7).
  • Services almost always provided the required advice and information. This differs from some specialised services, such as legal information and training or employment assistance, for which clients were more often referred to another agency (see Supplementary table CLIENTS.23).

Figure CLIENTS.7: Clients, by need for general services and service provision status (top 10), 2020–21

The stacked horizontal bar graph shows clients by need for general services and their provision status. Advice and information was the most needed general service, followed by advocacy/liaison on behalf on the client, material aid/brokerage, assistance for family/domestic violence, financial information, living skills/personal development, meals, transport, family/relationship assistance and assistance for trauma.

Specialised services

Specialised services refer to those services that require specific knowledge or skills and are usually undertaken by someone with qualifications to provide the particular service.

  • Health/medical services were identified as needed by almost 1 in 10 clients (or over 25,800) and were one of the services most often referred (23%) (Figure CLIENTS.8).
  • There has been little change in the most common specialised services needed and provided over the past 5 years; for example, health/medical services, mental health services and specialist counselling remain the most commonly needed services.

Figure CLIENTS.8: Clients by need for specialised services and service provision status (top 10), 2020–21

The stacked horizontal bar graph shows clients by need for specialised services and their provision status. Health and medical services was the most needed specialised service, followed by mental health services, culturally specific services, specialist counselling services, child protection services, financial advice and counselling, psychological services, drug/alcohol counselling, parenting skills education and assistance to connect culturally. Culturally specific services was provide to the highest number of clients and psychological services was provided to the fewest.

Financial assistance

In 2020–21, $109.4 million in financial assistance was provided to clients.

Around $109.4 million in financial assistance was provided to clients in 2020–21, a 59% increase from the $68.7 million provided in 2019–20 (not adjusted for inflation). This represents an average of $1,592 provided per client requesting financial assistance, and an increase from $976 in 2019–20 (not adjusted for inflation) (Supplementary table CLIENTS.25, Supplementary table CLIENTS.36).

  • More than three-quarters (81%) of the financial assistance was used to assist clients with housing in 2020–21.
  • More than half of the financial assistance (51% or $56.1 million) was used to provide short-term or emergency accommodation.
  • Around $33.0 million (30%) of the financial assistance was used to assist clients to establish or maintain their existing tenancy.

The COVID-19 pandemic has continued to increase people’s need for housing assistance. In response to this increased need, state and territory governments have implemented a range of funding assistance measures. Some of these measures have been aimed at purchasing short-term emergency accommodation and maintaining tenancies in mostly rental accommodation. For more information, see Policy framework for reducing homelessness and service response.

Outcomes at the end of support

Outcomes presented here describe the change in clients’ housing situation between the start and end of support. Data is limited to clients who ceased receiving support during the financial year—meaning that their support periods had closed and they did not have ongoing support at the end of the year. Around 3 in 5 (163,600 clients or 59%) clients had support periods in 2020–21 that were both opened and closed and were non-ongoing at the end of the 2020–21 financial year.

Many clients had long periods of support or even multiple support periods during 2020–21. They may have had a number of changes in their housing situation over the course of their support. These changes within the year are not reflected in the data presented here, rather the client situation at the start of their first period of support during 2020–21 is compared with the end of their last period of support in 2020–21.

Three aspects of a client’s housing situation are considered in their housing circumstances: dwelling type, housing tenure and the conditions of occupancy. See Data presentation and derivation for details on how each of these categories are derived.

  • The number of clients who were known to be homeless at the start of support reduced when support ended: 1 in 3 clients (33% or over 56,500) were known to be homeless when support ended, down from 44% (77,400) at the start of support (Supplementary table CLIENTS.30, Figure CLIENTS.9).
  • The reduction in the proportion of clients who were homeless following support was due to decreases in the proportion of clients rough sleeping or with no shelter or living in improvised dwellings (from 10% to 5.9%) and in the proportion of clients living in a house, townhouse or flat as a ‘couch surfer’ with no tenure (from 16% to 11%).
  • There was an increase in clients living in some form of tenure over the course of support, including an increase in the proportion of clients living in public or community housing from 15% (or 26,400 clients at the beginning of support) to 22% (or 37,500 clients at the end of support); and an increase in the proportion of clients living in private or other housing from 37% (or 65,500 clients at the beginning of support) to 42% (or 72,600 clients at the end of support).

These trends demonstrate that by the end of support, many clients have achieved or progressed towards a more positive housing solution. That is, clients ending support in public or community housing (renter or rent-free) or private or other housing (renter or rent-free) had increased compared with the start of support.

Figure CLIENTS.9: Housing situation at beginning and at end of support for clients with closed support, 2020–21

This interactive Sankey diagram shows the housing situation (including rough sleeping, couch surfing, short term accommodation, public/community housing, private housing and institutional settings) of clients with closed support periods at first presentation and at the end of support. The diagram shows clients’ housing situation journey from start to end of support. Most clients started and ended support in private or other housing. 

Other outcomes for clients

Specialist homelessness agencies may support clients in a number of non-housing areas to reduce their vulnerability to homelessness. These include changes in educational enrolment status, labour force status and income. In 2020–21:

  • Employment: Employment increased following support. Of those with a need for employment assistance, 14% were employed at the start of support and 23% were employed at the end of the support (Supplementary table CLIENTS.32).
  • Education: Education enrolment remained stable: 21% at the start of support and 22% at the end of support (Supplementary table CLIENTS.31). Of those who needed support for education or training assistance, 42% were enrolled at the start of support and 43% were enrolled at the end of support.
  • Income: Agencies assisted some clients with a need for and receiving a government payment: 73% at the start of support and 80% at the end of support (Supplementary table CLIENTS.33). There was a reduction following support in those reporting no income from 13% to 8.1%), and the proportion waiting for government benefits halved from 5.0% to 2.4%.