FDV reported to police

Police may be contacted following an incident of family and domestic violence (FDV). This can be done by a victim-survivor, witness or other person and, if considered a criminal offence, may be recorded as a crime by police. The ABS collects data on selected FDV crimes recorded by police in the Recorded crime – Victims and Recorded crime – Offenders collections (see Box 1). However, not all FDV crimes are reported to police and Recorded Crime data are an underestimate of FDV crimes and identified offenders. Further, not all FDV behaviours are considered criminal offences, and FDV offences will vary according to state and territory. This section discusses select FDV offences that are included in ABS Recorded Crime collections.

What do we know about reporting family and domestic violence to police?

The National Plan to End Violence against Women and Children 2022–2032 (The Plan) highlights that, despite increasing awareness and readiness to talk about FDV, work is needed to remove barriers to reporting to police for victim-survivors (DSS 2022). 

A 2022 review of research on police responses found that short-term police responses, such as attendance at a FDV incident, can increase reporting of future FDV and reduce FDV re-offending, and that protection orders and arrests improve victims’ and survivors’ perceptions of safety. It is unclear from the currently available research how arrests affect perpetrator re-offending and what factors influence the effectiveness of arrests in reducing re-offending (Bell and Coates 2022; Dowling et al. 2018).

Rates of reporting FDV to police have historically been negatively impacted by a range of factors including: fear of repercussions; misconceptions about what constitutes a crime; mistrust of police; concerns relating to the misidentification of the perpetrator; concerns relating to being believed and having to relive the experience; past negative experiences with police; institutional violence at the hands of police for some population groups; and barriers to accessing police, such as knowledge and understanding, geographical location and specific population group characteristics (ABS 2017; Douglas 2019; DSS 2022; Voce and Boxall 2018). 

Reports into women and girls’ experiences with the police and broader criminal justice system, such as the Queensland Hear her voice reports and the National Plan Victim-Survivor Advocates Consultation Final Report, acknowledge that work has been undertaken to improve police understanding of family, domestic and sexual violence (FDSV) and police responses to reports of gendered violence in recent years. However, they also highlight responses are still inadequate and lacking in consistency (Fitz-Gibbon et al 2022; Queensland Government 2022). Reports such as these also highlight the need to improve police response for those victim-survivors who experience intersecting forms of inequality and discrimination, for example, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (First Nations) people, culturally and linguistically diverse people, people with disability, and LGBTIQA+ people, see Population groups (Fitz-Gibbon et al 2022; Queensland Government 2022). The Plan indicates that enhanced education and training of police in terms of responses to reporting of gendered crime and improved access to safe and/or alternative reporting options should be implemented to improve reporting experiences (DSS 2022).

To understand the current extent of police involvement in FDV crimes in Australia, data on level of reporting to police, available from the ABS Personal Safety Survey (PSS) should be examined alongside recorded crime data (ABS Recorded Crime – Victims and ABS Recorded Crime – Offenders). For more information about these data sources, please see Data sources and technical notes.

Police-recorded FDV data are an underestimate of FDV-related offences

Examining whether or not police are contacted following family and domestic assault can provide an indication of reporting levels and utilisation of police services. Data on whether police were contacted (by the victim-survivor or another person) after an experience of family and domestic assault, as well as reasons for not contacting, are available from the ABS PSS. In the PSS, victim-survivors are referred to as people who have experienced violence, see What is family, domestic and sexual violence for more details.

The latest available data on whether police were contacted following the most recent incident of physical and/or sexual assault by a family member or intimate partner in the last 10 years are from the 2016 PSS. AIHW analysis of these data for female victim-survivor found that police were contacted in relation to around:

• 1 in 3 (32% or 278,000) FDV-related physical assaults by a male
• 1 in 6 (17% or 18,100) FDV-related physical assaults by a female
• 1 in 7 (14% or 50,100) FDV-related sexual assaults by a male (ABS 2017).

The 2021–22 PSS included data on female victim-survivors’ most recent incident of sexual assault by a male – see Sexual assault reported to police and the National Plan Outcomes measure Women who experienced sexual assault where the incident was reported to police.

Figure 1 allows users to further explore police contact by relationship types. Data for females who experienced sexual assault by a female and males who experienced any type of FDV assault and are not available due to data quality issues, see Data sources and technical notes.

Figure 1: Police contacted after most recent incident of family and domestic assault, females, 2016

Examining reasons why people did not contact police after family and domestic assault can provide insight into how victim-survivors can be better supported and encouraged to seek help. There are a range of reasons why female victim-survivors may not contact police following their most recent incident of FDV assault by a male perpetrator in the last 10 years. AIHW analysis of the 2016 PSS found that the 2 most common reasons female victim-survivors did not contact police were:

• they felt like they could deal with it themselves (40% of those who experienced physical assault and 33% who experienced sexual assault)
• they did not regard the incident as a serious offence (33% of those who experienced physical assault and 35% who experienced sexual assault) (Figure 2) (ABS 2017).

Data for males and some violence types are not available due to data quality issues, see Data sources and technical notes.

Figure 2: Reasons police not contacted after most recent incident of family and domestic assault, females, 2016

What do recorded crime data tell us?

The ABS collects data on a select range of offences recorded by police, including FDV incidents, and publishes these in the Recorded crime – Victims and Recorded crime – Offenders collections (see Box 1). These collections provide insight into police involvement in a subset of FDV incidents in the Australian community and the magnitude of FDV crimes relative to select crimes overall.

Based on data from Recorded Crime – Victims, in Australia in 2024:

• the proportion of police-recorded assaults related to FDV ranged from 41% to 65% across jurisdictions with available data (excluding Victoria) 
• almost 2 in 5 (39% or 175) recorded homicides and related offences were related to FDV
• 2 in 5 (41% or 16,300) recorded sexual assaults were related to FDV (ABS 2025b).

Over 1 in 4 (28% or 160) recorded kidnappings/abductions were related to FDV. FDV-related kidnappings/abductions most commonly involved victims aged 18–34 (55% or 88). Around 1 in 5 (19% or 30) involved children aged under 18 (ABS 2025b).

Has it changed over time?

Recorded Crime – Victims data show that in Australia, between 2014 and 2024, patterns of FDV victimisation rates varied between offence types:

• Rates for FDV-related homicide and related offences fluctuated over time, with the number of offences ranging between 106 and 175 each year.
• The rate of FDV-related sexual assaults doubled (from 30 to 60 per 100,000 people), with rates consistently higher for females than males. It is unclear whether this increase is due to changes in reporting behaviour, increased awareness about forms of violence, changes to police practices, an increase in incidents and/or a combination of these factors.
• Rates for FDV-related kidnapping/abduction were relatively stable over time, with the number of offences ranging between 113 and 169 each year (Figure 3).

See Data sources and technical notes for more information on rates and definitions of specific offences.

Figure 3: Victims of family and domestic violence crimes, by sex, 2014 to 2024

Is it the same for everyone?

Police-recorded FDV offences can be explored in terms of a range of different victim and crime characteristics. Depending on the offence, these can include: sex of victim, state and territory in which the incident was reported, victim age at report, victim age at incident, time to report, setting where the crime occurred and relationship of offender to victim.

In Australia during 2024, of police-recorded FDV-related sexual assaults:

• Almost 3 in 5 (57% or 9,300) involved victims aged under 18 at the time of the incident (54% of female victims and 81% of male victims).
• Almost 3 in 5 (59% or 9,500 were reported within one year of the incident.
• Almost 1 in 4 (24% or 3,900) were not reported for five or more years after the incident (Figure 4; ABS 2025b).

Data relating to relationship to perpetrator were not available for Western Australia and the Northern Territory. Across other jurisdictions, a higher proportion of FDV-related sexual assaults were perpetrated by an intimate partner than by a parent or ‘other’ family member. The proportion of FDV-related sexual assaults perpetrated by an intimate partner was higher for females than for males across all states and territories.

Relationship data are not restricted to specific age groups and therefore FDV-related sexual assaults involving a parent perpetrator can be broader than incidents of child sexual abuse, see Children and young people. Similarly, other relationship categories may include incidents of child sexual abuse.

For more information on disaggregations, see Data sources and technical notes.

Figure 4: Characteristics of family and domestic violence-related sexual assaults, 2024

In 2024, for states and territories where police-recorded FDV-related assault data were available (excluding Victoria for all assault data and Western Australia and Northern Territory for data relating to relationship to perpetrator):

• For females, current partners were the most common perpetrators for all states and territories. For males, current partners were only the most common perpetrator in Tasmania; an 'other' family member was the most common perpetrator in other states and territories.
• Victims who were aged 25–34 at the time of report accounted for the highest proportion of all FDV-related assaults, except in South Australia and the Australian Capital Territory where the highest proportion of victims were aged 35–44.
• The majority of FDV-related assaults occurred in a residential setting (Figure 5; ABS 2025b).

For more information on disaggregations, see Data sources and technical notes.

Figure 5: Characteristics of family and domestic assaults, 2024

Figure 6 provides the number and proportion of FDV-related homicide and related offences (murder, attempted murder, and manslaughter) recorded by police, by several characteristics (sex of victim, age at report, and setting where the crime occurred). It shows that of the 175 homicides recorded by police in 2024:

• almost 3 in 5 (57% or 99) victims were female
• almost 1 in 3 (31% or 54) victims were aged 55 years and over
• more than 4 in 5 (82% or almost 145) occurred in a residential setting (ABS 2025b).

For more information on disaggregations, see Data sources and technical notes.

Figure 6: Characteristics of family and domestic homicide and related offences, 2024

Offenders of FDV

The ABS Recorded crime – Offenders collection showed that in 2023–24:

• More than 1 in 4 (27% or 90,700) recorded offenders for any offence were proceeded against by police for at least one FDV related offence. The proportion was higher for male offenders (28%) than for female offenders (23%).
• The FDV offender rate was 381 per 100,000 people, a minimal change of 0.3% from 2022–23.
• The male FDV offender rate (606 per 100,000) was higher than the female offender rate (160 per 100,000).
• FDV offender rates varied between age groups, with males aged 30–34 years having the highest rate (1,120 per 100,000). The highest rates of female FDV offenders were among 18–19 and 20–24-year-olds (296 and 297 per 100,000, respectively).
• The most common principal offence amongst FDV offenders was assault (51% or 53,600 of all FDV offenders). Breach of domestic violence and non-violence orders was also common (28% or 25,400 of all FDV offenders) (ABS 2025a).

Related data are included in the National Plan Outcomes measures: 

• Breaches of FDV-related violence orders recorded by police
• Offenders of FDV-related offences proceeded against by police.

Following police charges, individuals may become a defendant in 1 or more criminal court case. For more information on defendants in FDV cases, see Legal systems. FDV offenders may also take part in specialist perpetrator interventions, which work to hold perpetrators to account and change their violent, coercive and abusive behaviours. More information can be found in Specialist perpetrator interventions.

More information

• National sexual violence responses
• Sexual assault in Australia