Download all data pages
PDF 5.6Mb
Data

Intentional self-harm hospitalisations by socioeconomic areas

Hospitalisations data for patients with intentional self-harm injuries includes those with and without suicidal intent. For further information refer to the Technical notes.

Socioeconomic status classifies individuals according to the socioeconomic characteristics of the area in which they live. These areas are defined using the ABS Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage (IRSD), which reflects the average level of socioeconomic disadvantage of the area (see Technical notes for more information).

Intentional self-harm hospitalisations, by age, sex and socioeconomic areas, Australia, 2012–13 to 2019–20.

The line graph shows age-specific rates of intentional self-harm hospitalisations from 2012–13 to 2019–20 by socioeconomic areas from Quintile 1, the most disadvantaged, to Quintile 5, the least disadvantaged. Users can also choose to view age-specific rates, numbers and proportion of hospitalisations for intentional self-harm by socioeconomic areas by sex and specific age groups. For the period 2012–13 to 2019–20, rates of intentional self-harm hospitalisations were highest in the most disadvantaged areas (Quintile 1) with the lowest rates in the least disadvantaged areas (Quintile 5). Rates varied across the period for all Quintiles. All Quintiles, except Quintile 5, recorded lower rates in 2019–20 than in 2012–13.

Does socioeconomic status affect risk of intentional self-harm?

Rates of hospitalisations for intentional self-harm tend to be higher for those living in lower socioeconomic (more disadvantaged) areas.

In 2019–20:

  • the rate for the most disadvantaged areas (Quintile 1) was 135 hospitalisations per 100,000 population, which is 1.6 times higher than the rate for the least disadvantaged areas (Quintile 5; 84 per 100,000 population).

A similar pattern was seen in suicide rates in 2019, see Suicide by socioeconomic areas.

How have rates of intentional self-harm hospitalisations changed for socioeconomic areas?

From 2012–13 to 2019–20:

  • the highest proportion of intentional self-harm hospitalisations was for people living in the lowest socioeconomic (most disadvantaged) areas; this proportion has remained relatively stable over the period at around 25%
  • rates for males in the lowest socioeconomic areas, Quintile 1 and 2, increased from 115 and 98 hospitalisations per 100,000 to 129 and 110 in 2016-17, respectively, and then decreased to 105 and 87 in 2019-20
  • rates for females in lower (most disadvantaged) socioeconomic areas also increased to 2016-17 and then decreased to 2019-20.

For both males and females, the highest age-specific rates of hospitalisations between 2012–13 and 2019–20 were recorded for those aged 25–44 in the lowest socioeconomic areas (Quintile 1), with the highest age-specific rates recorded for females in this age group.

  • Rates for females aged 25–44 in Quintile 1 increased from 243 per 100,000 population in 2012–13 to 272 in 2016–17 before falling to 213 in 2019–20.
  • Rates for males aged 25–44 in Quintile 1 fluctuated from 197 in 2012–13 to 213 in 2016–17 then fell to 172 in 2019–20.

An increase in the rate of hospitalisations due to intentional self-harm for all socioeconomic areas was reported in 2016–17, which may be due to increases in hospitalisations in 3 states. Variation in hospital admission policy and practices between states and territories may have contributed to differences in the reporting of hospitalisation data. For further information, see the data quality statement.

Previous page Next page