This content contains information some readers may find distressing.

If you, or someone you know needs help, contact Lifeline on 13 11 14. Go to the crisis and support services page for a list of support services.

Contact with objects leading to injury is the second most common cause of hospitalised injury in Australia after falls. Falling or moving objects, hard or sharp objects, household or industrial equipment and intruding foreign bodies are all potential causes of this type of injury.

Contact with objects resulted in:

79,800 hospitalisations in 2021–22

310 per 100,000 population

90 deaths in 2020–21

0.4 per 100,000 population

This represents 15% of injury hospitalisations and 0.6% of injury deaths. Males were particularly at risk, with a hospitalisation rate 2.7 times as high as females.

Contact with objects (known as Exposure to inanimate mechanical forces in ICD10 coding) includes harmful contact with everyday or industrial objects such as knives, tools, machines, and sports equipment. It also includes unintentional injuries caused by guns and non-heat-related injuries caused by explosions. (For heat-related injuries, see Thermal causes.) Transport accidents are covered in their own category, and so are excluded here.

Hospitalisations where the cause of injury is W44 Foreign body entering into or through eye or natural orifice and the type of injury is a foreign body in the respiratory tract (T17.2–T17.8) were included in this category until the June 2022 release of this report, after which they were re-classified into Choking and suffocation.

This chapter covers accidental contact with objects. Intentional injuries are included under Intentional self-harm and suicide and Assault and homicide

Objects that cause injury hospitalisations

The most common causes of hospitalisation for injuries due to exposure to inanimate mechanical forces fall under the broad categories listed in Table 1.

Table 1: Causes of hospitalisation due to contact with objects, 2021–22

Cause

Hospitalisations

%

Rate (per 100,000)

Contact with blunt objects such as doors, walls, trees, rocks, and sporting equipment (W20–22)

20,974

26

82

Contact with knives, glass, and other sharp objects (W25–26)

20,880

26

81

Contact with tools or machinery (W27–31)

17,124

21

67

Other or unspecified (W23–24, W32, W34–46, W49)

20,818

26

81

Total

79,796

100

311

Notes

  1. Rates are crude per 100,000 population, calculated using estimated resident population as at 31 December of the relevant year.
  2. Totals may not equal the sum of the rows due to rounding.
  3. Codes in brackets refer to the ICD-10-AM (11th edition) external cause codes for hospitalisations (ACCD 2019)
  4. Injuries relating to foreign body in respiratory tract (W44 + T17.2-T17.8) are now included in the Choking and Suffocation category.

Source: AIHW National Hospital Morbidity Database.

For more detail, see Data tables B15–16.

Objects that cause injury deaths

The most common cause of injury death due to exposure to inanimate mechanical forces was contact with blunt objects such as doors, walls, trees, rocks, and sporting equipment (39%) (Table 2).

Table 2: Causes of death due to contact with objects, 2020–21

Cause

Deaths

%

Rate (per 100,000)

Contact with blunt objects such as doors, walls, trees, rocks, and sporting equipment (W20–22)

35

39

0.1

Contact with tools or machinery (W27–31)

23

26

0.1

Caught, crushed, jammed or pinched in or between objects (W23)

10

11

0

Contact with knives, glass, and other sharp objects (W25–26)

9

10

0

Other or unspecified (W24, W32–W49)

13

14

0

Total

90

100

0.4

Notes

  1. Rates are crude per 100,000 population,calculated using estimated resident population as at 31 December of the relevant year.
  2. Totals may not equal the sum of the rows due to rounding.
  3. Codes in brackets refer to the ICD-10 external cause codes for hospitalisations (WHO 2011).

Source: AIHW National Mortality Database.

For more detail, see Data tables E22–24.

Trends over time

Over the period from 2017–18 to 2021–22, the age-standardised rate of hospitalisations due to contact with objects increased by an annual average of 1.1%. From 2012–13 to 2016–17 there was an average annual increase of 2.2%.

There is a break in the time series for hospitalisations between 2016–17 and 2017–18 due to a change in data collection methods (see the Technical notes for details).

For deaths due to contact with objects, the rate decreased over the period from 2011–12 and 2020–21 by an annual average of 0.6% (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Hospitalisations and deaths due to contact with objects, by sex by year

The graph features 2 matching sets of 3 lines on separate tabs, 1 tab for hospitalisations and 1 for deaths. The 3 lines represent the trend for males, persons and females. The reader can choose to display rate per 100,000 population or number.

For more detail, see Data tables C1–3 and F1–3.

Seasonal differences

Hospitalisations due to contact with objects show a mild seasonal pattern, with more injuries from November through to March (Figure 2).

The interactive display illustrates other seasonal differences in injury hospitalisations.

Figure 2: Seasonal differences in hospitalisations due to contact with objects, 2019–20 to 2021-22

3 line graph representing the trends for 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22

Notes
1. Admission counts have been standardised into two 15-day periods per month.
2. A scale up factor has been applied to June admissions to account for cases not yet separated.

Source: AIHW National Hospital Morbidity Database.

Age and sex differences

Injury rates due to contact with objects differ by sex and across age groups (Figure 3).

For injuries caused by contact with objects:

  • Males accounted for:
    • 73% of hospitalisations in 2021–22 and
    •  86% of deaths in 2020–21
  • the age-standardised rates of hospitalisation were:
    • 458 cases per 100,000 males, and
    • 171 per 100,000 females
  • males aged 15–24 had the highest rate of hospitalisations.

Figure 3: Hospitalisations due to contact with objects, by age group and sex,2021-22

Column graph representing 6 life-stage age groups by sex. The reader can choose to display either rate per 100,000 population or number, for either hospitalisations or deaths. The default displays hospitalisations for males and females and the reader can also choose to display persons.

For more detail, see Data tables A1–3 and D1–3.

Severity

There are many ways that the severity, or seriousness, of an injury can be assessed. Some of the ways to measure the severity of hospitalised injuries are:

  • number of days in hospital
  • time in an intensive care unit (ICU)
  • time on a ventilator
  • in-hospital deaths.

Using these measures, injuries due to contact with objects tend to be less severe than the average for all hospitalised injuries (Table 3).

Table 3: Severity of hospitalised injuries due to contact with objects, 2020–21
 

Injuries due to contact with objects

All injuries

Average number of days in hospital

1.8

4.7

% of cases with time in an ICU

0.5

2.0

% of cases involving continous ventilatory support

0.2

1.1

In-hospital deaths (per 1,000 cases)

0.6

5.9

Note: Average number of days in hospital (length of stay) includes admissions that are transfers from 1 hospital to another or transfers from 1 admitted care type to another within the same hospital, except where care involves rehabilitation procedures.

Source: AIHW National Hospital Morbidity Database.

For more detail, see Data tables A13–15.

Types of injuries sustained

In 2021–22 the wrist and hand were the body parts most often identified as the principal site of injury in hospitalisations due to contact with objects (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Injury hospitalisations due to contact with objects by main body part injured, 2021–22

Outline of a person with labels for body parts accounting for hospitalisations due to contact with objects. Injuries to the wrist and hand accounted for the most hospitalisations due to contact with objects while the trunk (including spine, abdomen, and pelvis) accounted for the fewest.

NoteBody part refers to the principal reason for hospitalisation. Number and percentage of injuries classified as Other, multiple and incompletely specified body regions or Injuries not described in terms of body region not shown-see Data table A11.Source: AIHW National Hospital Morbidity Database.

For more detail, see Data table A11.

Open wound was the most common type of injury for people who were hospitalised due to contact with objects (Figure 5).

Figure 5: Hospitalised injuries due to contact with objects, by type of injury, by sex, 2021–22

Bar graph showing type of injury sustained by category and by sex. Open wound was the most common type for both males and females, followed by fracture. The reader can choose to display either the crude rate per 100,000 population or the number of cases. The default display shows data for males and females, and the reader can also choose to display for persons.

For more detail, see Data table A10.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people

In 2021–22, among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people:

  • there were almost 5,000 hospitalisations (Table 4) and fewer than 5 deaths due to contact with objects
  • males, compared with females, were 2.0 times as likely to be hospitalised due to contact with objects
  • hospitalisation rates were highest among people aged 15–24, compared with other life-stage age groups (Figure 5).
Table 4: Injury hospitalisations due to contact with objects, by sex, Indigenous Australians, 2021–22

 

Males

Females

Persons

Number

3,357

1,683

5,040

Rate (per 100,000)

764

383

573

Note: Rates are crude per 100,000 population.
Source: AIHW National Hospital Morbidity Database.

Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians

In 2021–22, Indigenous Australians, compared with non-Indigenous Australians, were 1.9 times as likely to be hospitalised due to contact with objects (after adjusting for differences in population age structure) (Table 5).

Table 5: Age-standardised rates (per 100,000) of injury hospitalisations due to contact with objects, by Indigenous status and sex, 2021–22

 

Males

Females

Persons

Indigenous Australians

756

 368

 560

Non-Indigenous Australians

442

162

302

Notes

  1. Rates are age-standardised to the 2001 Australian population (per 100,000).
  2. ‘Non-Indigenous Australians’ excludes cases where Indigenous status is missing or not stated.

Source: AIHW National Hospital Morbidity Database.

The rate of injury hospitalisations due to contact with objects was highest among the 15–24 age group for both Indigenous Australians and non-Indigenous Australians (Figure 6). Deaths data are not presented here because of small numbers.

Figure 6: Injury hospitalisations due to contact with objects, by Indigenous status, by age group and sex, 2021–22

Column graph representing hospitalisation data for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians by 6 life-stage age groups. The reader can choose to display rate per 100,000 or number. The reader can also choose to display data for persons, males, or females.

For more detail, see Data tables A4–6 and D4–6.

Remoteness

In 2021–22, people living in Very remote areas, compared with people living in Major cities, were nearly twice as likely to be hospitalised due to contact with objects (using age-standardised rates) (Table 6).

Table 6: Age-standardised rates (per 100,000) of injury hospitalisations due to contact with objects by remoteness and sex, 2021–22
 

 Males

 Females

 Persons

Major cities

418

161

289

Inner regional

529

181

355

Outer regional

550

197

377

Remote

646

251

456

Very remote

707

368

547

Note: Rates are age-standardised per 100,000 population.
Source: AIHW National Hospital Morbidity Database.

The highest rate of injury hospitalisations due to contact with objects was among the 15–24 age group living in Very remote areas of Australia (Figure 7).

Deaths data are not presented here because of small numbers.

Figure 7: Hospitalisations due to contact with objects, by remoteness, by age group and sex, 2021–22

Column graph representing hospitalisation data for each of the 5 remoteness categories by 6 life-stage age groups. The reader can choose to display rate per 100,000 population or number. The reader can also choose to display data for persons, males, or females.

For more detail, see Data tables A7–9 and D9–10.

For information on how statistics by remoteness are calculated, see the technical notes.

Data details

Technical notes: how the data were calculated

Data tables: download full data tables

Glossary