Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2022) Australia's children, AIHW, Australian Government, accessed 04 February 2023.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2022). Australia's children. Retrieved from https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/children-youth/australias-children
Australia's children. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 25 February 2022, https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/children-youth/australias-children
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia's children [Internet]. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2022 [cited 2023 Feb. 4]. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/children-youth/australias-children
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) 2022, Australia's children, viewed 4 February 2023, https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/children-youth/australias-children
Get citations as an Endnote file:
PDF | 17.6Mb
For most children, their family offers them love, support and a sense of belonging. While what constitutes a family can vary widely, the benefits of being part of a strong and positive family unit are more universal. A strong and positive family unit can:
Families are also considered to be an important determinant of how children view quality of life, with family ranked the most important domain for having a good life by all year levels participating in the 2014 ACWP (Redmond et al. 2016). Being part of a strong, positive family unit is known as positive family functioning. For this section, family functioning has been considered in terms of 6 overlapping domains (Table 1).
Closeness of relationships, warmth, responsiveness, sensitivity, support, community, and security/safety.
Age-appropriate rules, expectations and consistency in parenting.
Engagement and cognitive development
Family cohesion and quality time spent fostering various skills and interests.
Access to services, products and activities aimed at improving or maintaining good physical health.
Quality of relationships between family members and their overall ability to get along with one another.
Involvement in, and support of, activities and relationships outside the household.
Source: Pezzullo et al. 2010.
While most children live in a house where some or all aspects of their family are positively functioning, not all children do. For some children, families may not be able to provide a safe and supportive environment and the children may experience abuse or neglect and may end up living in non-parental care.
There is no single overarching measure of family functioning and measurement is complex, given the concept is multi-dimensional.
This section provides a selection of national data which relate to 5 of the 6 domains of family functioning (Box 1).
Data from the LSAC and ACWP are used to provide insight into these domains of family functioning:
These domains are structured in 4 subsections:
A selection of statistically significant comparisons between population groups has been included for each of these subsections.
Some data relevant to other family functioning domains are available in Health and Social networks.
Conflict—or lack of conflict—is 1 measure of the quality of a family’s relationships and ability to get along. Conflict among members, especially between parents, has been associated with negative outcomes for children, including higher rates of aggression, anxiety, depression and physical health problems (Davies & Cummings 1994; Zubrick et al. 2008).
Conflict between family members can be exacerbated by factors including:
What constitutes conflict can range in severity from a disagreement between members to family violence. One indicator of the degree of family conflict is the amount people yell at each.
It is estimated using data from LSAC in 2012 that 55% (or 134,000) of children aged 12–13 never or hardly ever had people in their family yell at each other—11% reported that yelling happened often/always. For families where the child was reported as needing or using more medical care, mental health or educational services than is usual for children the same age, 20% said people in their family often/always yelled at each other.
It is estimated using data from LSAC in 2016 that 90% (or 214,000) of primary parents (the child’s primary carer), to children aged 12–13, said their family’s ability to get along with one another was good, very good or excellent (Figure 1).
Chart: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Source: AIHW analysis of the LSAC.
Family cohesion refers to the quality time family members spend together that can lead to developing emotional bonds, boundaries, coalitions, shared interests and ability to make decisions together (Olson 1993; Redmond et al 2016).
Strong family cohesion is associated with increased ability to cope with difficult situations, while lack of family cohesion is associated with:
The 2014 ACWP found that most children (94%) in years 4, 6 and 8, spent quality time with their family most days in the week before the survey (this includes at least 1 of talking, having fun or learning with their family most days—Figure 2).
Note: Children responded separately to each category so totals do not add to 100%.
Chart: AIHW. Source: AIHW analysis of the ACWP.
The 2014 ACWP found that 71% of children spent time having fun together with their family most days in the week before the survey (Figure 3). Responses differed for children with disability compared with children without disability (59% compared with 73%).
The 2014 ACWP found that about half (48%) of children spent time learning together with their family most days in the week before the survey (Figure 4). Older children were less likely to spend time learning together with their family—41% of Year 8 students reported spending time most days learning together with their family compared with 51% for Year 4 students and 52% for Year 6 students.
Parents play a key role in the overall functioning of a family. Parenting considered to be high quality and/or effective, tends to include elements of support (including presence of warmth and lack of hostility), consistency and interest in a child’s life (Zubrick et al. 2008).
High quality and/or effective parenting has been linked to a wide range of positive child outcomes, including improved physical and mental health, cognitive development and educational attainment. Poor parenting has been associated with substance misuse, unemployment and juvenile offending (Davidov & Grusec 2006; Davis-Kean 2005; Repetti et al. 2002).
The quality and effectiveness of parenting can be influenced by factors including parental health, parental education, culture and accessibility of resources, parenting and socioeconomic status are also positively related (Bornstein 2002; Davis-Kean 2005; Parenting Research Centre 2017; Zubrick et al. 2008).
Supporting parents to provide quality and effective parenting is considered important for improving the wellbeing of children and reducing social disadvantage (Department of Health 2019; Parenting Research Centre 2017; Parker & McDonald 2010). Looking at the concerns, needs and behaviours of parents, the Parenting Today in Victoria survey (Box 2) aims to understand parent experiences.
The Parenting Today in Victoria survey was a 2016 state-wide survey. It was designed to explore the day-to-day experiences of today’s parents. It looked at their attitudes, behaviours and practices, concerns and help-seeking behaviour.
Some key findings include:
It is estimated using data from LSAC in 2016 that 88% (or 202,000) of children aged 12–13 would talk to their mum and/or dad if they had a problem (Figure 5).
Overall, children were more likely to talk to their mum than their dad (86% compared with 64%), with boys more likely to talk to their dad than girls (74% compared with 54%).
Note: Children may choose to speak to more than 1 person so totals do not add to 100%.
Chart: AIHW. Source: AIHW analysis of the LSAC.
It is estimated using data from LSAC in 2016 that, according to a consistent parenting scale 95%, or 221,000, primary parents to children aged 12–13 reported providing consistent parenting about half the time or more often (Box 3).
The LSAC consistent parenting scale is a series of 5 questions answered on a scale of 1 to 5. These questions ask both parents if they make sure their child does something when asked, and if they punish their child when they said they would. A score of 3 or higher indicates that parents provide consistent parenting about half the time or more often.
The 2014 ACWP found that most (85%) children said their parents asked them what they were learning in school weekly or more often. Similarly, 86% said their parents made sure they set time aside for their homework weekly or more often (Figure 6).
Children attending schools in the highest socioeconomic areas were more likely to say their parents made sure they set time aside for their homework weekly or more often compared with children attending schools in the lowest socioeconomic areas (89% compared with 81%, respectively). There were also differences between Indigenous and non-Indigenous children (70% compared with 87%, respectively).
More than half (56%) of students said their parents talk to their teachers at least once a term (Figure 7). This rate decreased with age, and Year 8 students (38%) were less likely to say their parents talk to their teacher once a term or more often than Year 4 and Year 6 students (68% and 61%, respectively).
Another aspect of families and how well they function is the perceived equity of member contributions to the household. The perception that the distribution of types of contributions—financial, household chores and child care—is fair to all members, has been associated with decreased tension and conflict, and increased cohesion (Cerrato & Cifre 2018; Newkirk et al 2017). What constitutes fair can differ dramatically depending on family factors including, but not limited to, agreed roles, age and capacity of individual members and Parental health and disability (AIFS 2015; Coltrane 2000; Putnick & Bornstein 2016)
Completing household chores, including looking after another family member, can serve as a way of teaching children important life skills, providing them with a sense of achievement and enabling them to earn rewards such as praise or pocket money—all contributors to positive wellbeing (Putnick & Bornstein 2016; The University of Minnesota 2014).
However, this is only in the case with age-appropriate chores and responsibilities (Putnick & Bornstein 2016).
The 2014 ACWP, which found a positive relationship between children who do housework and spend time caring for relatives and overall wellbeing, reported that almost 4 out of 5 (78%) students said they helped with housework weekly or more often (Redmond et al. 2016). Figure 8 shows, this rate increased with age, with Year 4 students (71%) less likely to say they helped with housework weekly or more often than year 6 and 8 students (81% and 82%, respectively).
The ACWP also found that 63% of children spent time taking care of their siblings or other family members at least once a week.
It is estimated using data from LSAC in 2016 that for 2-parent households, 45% of primary parents of children aged 12–13 said they did their fair share of domestic tasks (such as housework, home maintenance, shopping and cooking), and 51% said they did more than their fair share. This differed significantly from secondary parents in 2-parent households:
Similarly, 51% of primary parents in 2-parent households said they did their fair share of the child-rearing tasks (physical and emotional care), and 47% said they did more of their fair share, compared with 70% of secondary parents who said they did their fair share and 8.5% who said they did more.
In 39% of 2-parent households, both parents said they did their fair share of child-rearing tasks (Figure 9).
Note: Parent 1 is defined as the child’s primary carer (in most cases this is the child’s biological mother). Parent 2 is Parent 1’s partner or another adult in the home with a parental relationship to the study child (in most cases this is the biological father, but stepfathers are also common. 1-parent households are not included.
Except for the National Framework for Protecting Australia’s Children indicator on family functioning, which uses LSAC data to report on families’ ability to get along, there are no nationally defined indicators for family functioning. Also, relevant information on family functioning in ongoing, national population surveys is limited.
For more information on family functioning, see: What’s missing? in Social Support.
For more information on Family functioning, see: Family functioning indicator in the National Framework for Protecting Australia’s Children.
AIFS (Australian Institute of Family Studies) 2015. The Longitudinal Study of Australian Children annual statistical report 2014. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Altiere MJ & von Kluge SJ 2009. Family functioning and coping behaviours in parents of children with autism. Journal of Child and Family Studies.
Bornstein MH (Ed) 2002. Handbook of parenting (2nd Edition). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. New Jersey, United States of America.
Cerrato J & Cifre E 2018. Gender inequality in household chores and work-family conflict. Frontiers in Psychology 9:1330.
Coltrane S 2000. Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family 62(4):1208–1233.
Davidov M & Grusec JE 2006. Untangling the links of parental responsiveness to distress and warmth to child outcomes. Child Development 77(1):44–58.
Davies PT & Cummings EM 1994. Marital conflict and child adjustment: an emotional security hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin 116(3):387–411.
Davis-Kean PE 2005. The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: the indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology 19(2):294.
Department of Health 2019. National Action Plan for the health of children and young people: 2020–2030. Canberra: Australian Government.
Hartley SL, Papp LM, Mihaila I, Bussanich PM, Goetz G & Hickey EJ 2017. Couple conflict in parents of children with versus without autism: self-reported and observed findings. Journal of Child and Family Studies 26(8):2152–2165.
Hosseinkhanzadeh AA, Esapoor M, Yeganeh T & Mohammadi R 2013. A study of the family cohesion in families with mentally disabled children. Procedia—Social and Behavioural Sciences 84:749–753.
Joh JY, Kim S, Park JL & Kim YP 2013. Relationship between family adaptability, cohesion and adolescent problem behaviors: curvilinearity of circumplex model. Korean Journal of Family Medicine 34(3):169–177.
Newkirk K, Perry-Jenkins M & Sayer AG 2017. Division of household and childcare labor and relationship conflict among low-income new parents. Sex Roles 76(5):319–333. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0604-3.
Olson DH 1993. Circumplex model of marital and family systems: assessing family functioning. In Walsh, F. (ed.), Normal family processes, 2nd edn. pp.104–137. New York: Guilford Press.
Parenting Research Centre 2017. Parenting Today in Victoria: technical report produced for the Department of Education and Training, Victoria. Melbourne: Parenting Research Centre.
Parker R & McDonald M 2010. Assessing and responding to parenting support needs in disadvantaged families. Communities and Families Clearinghouse Australia Practice Sheet. Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne.
Pezzullo L, Taylor P, Mitchell S, Pejoski L, Le K & Bilgrami A 2010. Positive family functioning: final report by Access Economics Pty Limited for Department of Families, Housing, Community Service and Indigenous Affairs. Canberra, Australia.
Putnick DL & Bornstein MH 2016. Girls’ and boys’ labor and household chores in low- and middle-income countries. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development vol. 81(1):104–122.
Redmond G, Skattebol J, Saunders P, Lietz P, Zizzo G, O’Grady E et al. 2016. Are the kids alright? Young Australians in their middle years: Final report of the Australian Child Wellbeing Project, Flinders University, University of New South Wales and Australian Council for Educational Research.
Repetti RL, Taylor SE & Seeman TE 2002. Risky families: family social environments and the mental and physical health of offspring. Psychological Bulletin 128(2):330.
Scott D 2013. Meeting children’s needs when the family environment isn’t always ‘good enough’: a systems approach. Child Family Community Australia paper 14. Australian Institute of Families.
Schermerhorn AC, Cummings EM, DeCarlo CA & Davies PT 2007. Children’s influence in the marital relationship. Journal of Family Psychology 21:259–269.
University of Minnesota 2014. Involving children in household tasks: is it worth the effort? Viewed 26 August 2019,
Zubrick SR, Smith GJ, Nicholson JM, Sanson AV & Jackiewicz TA 2008. Parenting and families in Australia. Social Policy Research.
For more information, see: Methods.
We'd love to know any feedback that you have about the AIHW website, its contents or reports.
The browser you are using to browse this website is outdated and some features may not display properly or be accessible to you. Please use a more recent browser for the best user experience.